No preamble this week, but plenty of regular amble down below. If you didn’t read my thoughts from last week, they still generally apply, so maybe check those out before we continue.
Let’s just say that despite following the rankings week in and week out on my own, I did not expect two of the monster moves listed below.
I’ve highlighted the major movers in green and red. The two moves that I absolutely did not expect to see there were Chelsea going from 3rd down to 7th, and Fulham going from nearly last to middle of the table. Through 10 games, teams are still somewhat volatile, and a couple of bad games in a row can still propel a team up or down the rankings. That said, we’re a quarter of the way through the season, so these rankings as they currently exist are pretty much how you’d expect them to play for the rest of the year unless major changes are made.
Analytics guys have been talking fairly openly about how bad Fulham are for some time now, and given where they were ranked five weeks ago, I wholeheartedly agreed with them. The surface numbers still peg them as one of the worst teams in the league. Their TSR rank is… well, last. And okay, defensively they are probably the second or third worst team in the league.
The big problem with this team is that they simply have no control in midfield. Like, zero. Steve Sidwell was bad last year. Sidwell plus the shell of Scott Parker is dire. Hangeland and Riether at least are quite handy defenders, and their keeping situation is generally okay. But because everything flows straight from the attacking end back at Fulham’s defense at pace, they really struggle against most teams.
The thing that’s saving them is that offensively they still have a lot of talent. Berbatov and Ruiz could easily play for better teams, and Darren Bent – despite being a player who just is never that involved offensively – can still score goals. Systemically they are shit, but good offensive players can still save a team.
Why is this team so much worse than the one who was actually quite good for the first ten matches last season? No fucking clue. Under the surface this year, they are now performing a bit better than people expect, and it keeps showing up in the results. Confusing stuff.
How does a Mourinho team go from being ranked 3rd to 7th in the space of five weeks?
Step 1) Get dominated at home by Manchester City. (And City were clearly better that match, even though the Hart gaffe gave Chelsea the win).
Step 2) Get dominated on the road by Newcastle.
That’s it. Chelsea went from rolling teams during a fairly easy stretch of schedule, to looking a bit off the pace against two decent teams in a row. (Newcastle at home are decent. Newcastle on the road… maybe not.)
The big problem for this club is that, like Fulham, they also don’t have good control of the match in the center of the pitch. Mourinho’s system works best with a runner + destroyer and a defensive regista like Xabi Alonso involved. Right now he kind of has the runner + destroyer in Ramires (who probably runs more and destroys less, but is quite talented), but they have absolutely no one who can play the distribution + control role. I highlighted this issue in my season preview – “Can Chelsea win the title with Obi Mikel and the ghost of Michael Essien as their defensive midfield?” but the loss of van Ginkel removed yet another important option for that role.
It’s interesting to compare how AVB and Mourinho tweak what is basically the same system. AVB prefers to go with two defensive holding midfielders, and has been strangling his team’s creativity with his team selection to the point that they simply aren’t scoring. Mourinho doesn’t have the personnel at DM that AVB does, but at this point in his career is more likely to deploy more offensive-minded players anyway. This results in Chelsea having problems shutting down better clubs defensively.
Basically, Chelsea’s midfield is a collection of older, slightly mis-matched parts to go along with their aging, but generally solid defense. The Premier League might be too good this year to allow him to get away with this group of personnel and still win the title. Or Mou might figure out the right combination of parts to steam roll the last 28 games, including adding what they need in midfield in January.
It’s impossible to rule his genius out.
I think they will recover a bit in the rankings, and obviously they are still second in the table, but I also feel like they will continue to have problems against the better teams in the league. The fact that there are actually nine other teams who can give them problems makes this league campaign a lot more random than it normally would be.
In the link at the beginning of the article, I wrote about Moyes the Muggle, and how he’s taken a lot of the magic out of United’s offense. What I did not expect was that United’s defense would suffer so much in the process.
Here are the baseline defensive stats for United this year under Moyes:
That’s a fairly significant jump in rate between shots conceded and SOT conceded, which means United have some major issues with defensive organization. I say I’m surprised by this because it’s one of the things he did really well at Everton.
While we’re here though, check out the real problem.
Elite teams do not give up shots on target at that rate. Neither do good teams. In fact, Opta’s Devin Pleuler and our own Colin Trainor have both noted that the shots United are conceding in the first 10 matches of the year have the highest likelihood of yielding opposing goals of anyone in the league. Compare that to what the same stat looked like under Fergie and you see the size of the problem.
The really odd thing is that Everton were only a small touch worse than United defensively last year, obviously with much cheaper personnel. Moyes knows defense, but this team shows no evidence of that so far.
So yeah, things are not at all right for United at the moment. To make matters worse, they face the league’s best team at creating chances this weekend. Things like this have already been happening to United this season.
If the model has its way, then Cardiff, Sunderland, and Crystal Palace are getting relegated, but Norwich are bad enough that they’re in the mix. Obviously the 7-0 hammering at Manchester City isn’t exactly going to help. Sunderland are showing signs of being less terrible than under Crazy Paolo, despite giving up 25 shots against Hull. I don’t think it will save them, but it’s enough to make Chris Hughton uncomfortable.
After them you have a very grindy set of teams that should be safe, but won’t exactly be exciting. This includes West Ham, who would probably be better if they had any semblance of a forward line. Nice Andy Carroll purchase there, Allardici.