Who are the stealth MVPs of the Bundesliga's best teams?

As we approach the two-thirds mark of the Bundesliga season, an everyone-is-in-the-race kind of start at the top half of the league table has boiled down to a five-horse title race. Bayern München, Borussia Dortmund, RB Leipzig, Borussia Mönchengladbach and even (yes, I know) Bayer Leverkusen all have at least some shot at becoming champs.  We’re all familiar with the seasons that the absolute stars of these teams are having, with Robert Lewandowski and Timo Werner’s seemingly bottomless bags of goals and the emergence of Erling Haaland and Jadon Sancho as bona fide superstars as most illustrative examples. But what about the unsung heroes of these top clubs? Well, those guys get their moment in the sun in this here article. May we present the Stealth MVP’s 0f Germany’s five best squads.

Bayern München: Thomas Müller

Oh yes, we did the Thomas Müller ‘dance’ this year.  Like. Every. Other. Freaking. Year. When will we stop putting too much value on aesthetically pleasing skills in attackers? Yes, Müller is not the most graceful player that German football has ever spawned - not by a mile. But, c’mon. Look at this.

Oh, you think he's more of a midfielder now? Just. Look. At. This.

Reinstating Müller as a full time starter has been - besides employing Joshua Kimmich as a defensive midfielder on a permanent basis - one of interim manager Hansi Flick’s biggest moves at the Bayern wheel. In twelve leagues under Flick’s guidance, Müller has contributed big-time with five goals and ten (!) assists. He has done so as one of the attacking mids, and as a false right-winger. Müller is still one of football’s space-seekers, who knows how to get to good shooting positions. But the thirty year old Bayern-lifer is also still one of the best defending attackers out there, and plays a big role in the middle phase of his team’s play in possession.

RB Leipzig: Konrad Laimer

The role of defensive midfielder in Leipzig’s high-octane playing style is a tough one. Where box-to-box energizer-bunny Marcel Sabitzer gets to do the glamour work in midfield, his countryman Konrad Laimer might be even more important for the success of this squad.

That Laimer doesn’t boast the tidiest of passing numbers, has to do with Leipzig’s extremely vertical style of play. The Austrian midfielder needs to get the ball up the field, to the speedsters up front, as quickly and directly as possible. And he does so in impressive fashion. Laimer is the iron-lunged type you’d expect in Leipzig’s engine room in midfield, but has a surprising amount of skill when he’s on the ball.

But Laimer shines most when the opposition has the ball. He forms the backbone of Leipzig’s wild press. When the front four (or five) is going all-out to win the ball back or hurry the opposing build-up high upfield, Laimer’s there to cover the spaces that open up behind those ‘pressing missiles’. 

Borussia Dortmund: Dan-Axel Zagadou

Admittedly, Dortmund’s defence is still not good. But it is improving, big time. This is Dortmund’s defensive team radar from the start of the season until mid-November, when they got walloped at Bayern München (4-0), and followed that disappointment by slipping up at home against lowly Paderborn (3-3).

These defensive woes forced Lucien Favre to switch systems. The 4-2-3-1 formation got swapped for a 3-4-2-1 shape. The extra centre-back has helped.

With an extra slot opening up in the backline, Dan-Axel Zagadou has snagged his chance in recent weeks. The gargantuan (6 foot 5, at minimum) French youngster might have stood out in a negative sense in the 2-1 win against PSG in midweek, with his whiffed tackle attempt rolling out the red carpet for Kylian Mbappé to assist an undeserved Neymar equalizer. But besides this slip-up, the twenty year-old has been an excellent addition to the Dortmund starting lineup.

Zagadou is weirdly speedy for someone his size - not unlike a certain striker in his squad - and also adds some much-needed ‘oomph’ to the Dortmund backline with his aerial prowess. But Zagadou might be an even better addition on the other side of the ball. Against PSG, the team that never gave him a fair shot at first-team minutes when he was a major talent in the Parisian youth academy, Zagadou demonstrated once again that he’s extremely comfortable in possession. This might not be a shocker, but: an NBA-sized, left-footed, silky-smooth passing and athletically gifted athlete at centre back is pretty hard to find. This Dortmund squad contains some freakish talent up and down the roster.

Borussia Mönchengladbach: Nico Elvedi

Let’s take a look at the defensive heat map Borussia Mönchengladbach this season. 

You see that? Opponents clearly chose to attack the right-hand side of Gladbach’s backline. This has something to do with the excellent performances of Die Fohlen’s centre-back on the left side of the defence. Nico Elvedi is slowly but surely making his case for the title of best centre-back in the Bundesliga.

That Elvedi is a very solid player on the defensive side of the ball, was already a known fact in and around German (and Swiss) football. But that the right-footed centre-back - who’s mobile enough to have 57 senior appearances at full-back in previous seasons - is a crucial pawn in Gladbach’s build-up from the back from the ‘wrong side’ (left) of the 3+1 structure that his team uses, has been a wildly impressive development to watch. 

Bayer Leverkusen: Kevin Volland

Sure, creative and skillful talents such as Kai Havertz, Leon Bailey, Moussa Diaby and Nadiem Amiri each have a rosy footballing future ahead of them. But take one guess which player in Die Werkself (‘The Workman’s Eleven) has been involved in the most goals this season? Hint: it’s the same dude who led the team in combined goals and assists in 2018-19 and 2017-18. Hot take: it’s pretty weird that Kevin Volland hasn’t logged a national team minute since 2016.

Volland, who can also contribute as an inverted winger on both flanks or as a second striker, shines in a pretty complex role as the frontman in Peter Bosz’ playing system. He’s responsible for the first wave of pressure in the Bosz-press when the opposition has the ball, and drifts wide and towards midfield in possession, to pose opposing centre backs questions in their marking scheme. He does all this, and consistently gets good shots off. Volland is good, y’all. Real good.

How many more years will he have to keep doing this until he's no longer eligible to round out our stealth MVP list?

Can Olympiacos turn Arsenal's Europa League chances into a Greek tragedy?

A number of fans of the top four leagues used to complain when their team finished fourth Those fans should put themselves in Olympiacos boots — they began play on July 23, when most players were still posting Instagram selfies of themselves on yachts, and from that dismal first outing, a goalless draw with Viktoria Plzeň, it looked as though they wouldn’t be sticking around long. But in Athens, Olympiacos came roaring back, scoring four against the hapless visitors. The Thrylos lived up to their name, The Legend, scoring 13 altogether during qualifying while allowing just one. Even more impressively, they held Spurs to a draw, scored two against Bayern, and beat Red Star, all at home. Sure, their goal difference was -6 at the end of the group stages, but their four points were enough to keep them in Europe. I say all this to make two points: Olympiacos are not going to play as though the Europa League is beneath them, nor are they going to be gentle when teams come to Athens. All this time spent, all this goalscoring against some pretty decent teams, well . . . these Olympians are after a medal. In the league, they’re used to standing atop that podium, having won 44 league titles and currently sitting two points above PAOK at the top of the table, with an astonishing +41 goal difference. The side’s dominance is similarly reflected in expected goals. They dominate the league in non-penalty xG difference, averaging 1.23 per match, far and away the best total in Greece.  Pedro Martins likes to play an aggressive style of football, pressing forward in numbers, trying to force the opponent to make a mistake and looking for opportunities to create a chance. A heat map of their defensive activity shows just how aggressively they’re parked in the opponents final third, pressing and winning the ball back. This works well at the league level, where Olympiacos’ quality tends to be head and shoulders above the rest of the crowd. However, during the January transfer window they lost Portuguese winger Daniel Podence, arguably their most talented player, to Wolves.  He was a significant creator for this team, and the clear leader in open play xG assisted per 90 in the side. It’s fair to wonder how the team will make up for his creativity. That’s especially true away from home, where the team has largely been a much less robust attacking side. But the thing is, Olympiacos won’t be playing away against Arsenal. And they aren’t the most welcoming of hosts. Now, Arsenal have been through the Europa League rodeo enough recently that they’re aware of just how difficult it is to face Eastern European clubs on their own turf. In fact, Arsenal have visited Karaiskakis Stadium four times in the mighty Champions League, and lost three of those times. Of course, this is a revived Arsenal, fresh off a 4–0 victory to the mighty Newcastle, sitting pretty in 10th in the Premier League. Yes, that’s written in sarcasm font, but the thing is, Arsenal are still better than Olympiacos. Like, a lot better. So while home-field advantage may be enough to throw the visitors off at the start, it won’t be sufficient to beat the Gunners on its own. Fortunately, Olympiacos have another trick up their sleeve; while they may play more defensively in European competition, are still exceedingly dangerous on the counter. The biggest threat is in the form of Youssef El Arabi, who has scored 22 goals this season between the Superleague and Champions League (including qualifying). He has scored or assisted in 9 of his last 12 games, including netting one hat trick and two braces. He may be 33, and he may be getting less service with Podence gone, but he should not be underestimated — it’s not exactly easy to keep a man scoring almost a goal a game on average at bay. The man simply knows how to find great shots. Plus, he’s got the 35-year-old Mathieu Valbuena by his side; when the veteran is not injured he’s helping fill the hole Podence left, having provided 12 assists thus far.Domestically, Valbuena leads the club with 0.40 xG assisted per 90, thanks in no small part to his mastery on set pieces. Olympiacos’s designated deadball wizard is responsible for almost all of the team’s set piece creativity with 0.19 xG assisted per 90 accumulated from those situations alone. Another way Olympiacos could pull off a magical moment is by giving the fullbacks freedom to run Both Kostas Tsimikas on the left and Omar Elabdellaoui on the right love to get forward, which could cost Arsenal if their wingers aren’t able to track back. Over the course of the season the two fullbacks have combined with Podence and Valbuena to do almost all of the team’s crossing, with Tsimikas in particular being a frequent avenue for pumping balls into the box. Both Bayern and Tottenham are familiar with just how well Olympiacos can play on the counter. While in general, Mikel Arteta has managed to improve his side’s ability to defend against such attacks, but it’s still a weakness the home side can exploit. Of course, Olympiacos have their own weaknesses. They have trouble controlling the center of the pitch, especially in European games. Players like Andreas Bouchalakis, Mady Camara, and Guilherme can dominate in league games, but are rather ineffective when facing stronger competition. While the side plays defensively on the front foot against weaker competition, they get forced well back by better sides. Their defensive heatmap in the Champions League shows a side whose midfield was either not asked to, or not able to, stop the opposition before it reached their own defensive third. Yet this is not the same Arsenal of years past. So, the question remains, just how good are Arsenal? Can they dominate the ball, exploit Olympiacos’s weaknesses and force them back? Because, if they can’t, the Greek side will hit them fast and hard, the crowd will be ready and willing to make a bit of noise in response, and the Gunners may find themselves with few effective weapons to counter the storm

La Liga roundup: Villarreal's ups and downs, Suso at Sevilla, Barcelona's unique goal kicks and more

Villarreal’s topsy-turvy season, Suso at Sevilla, Barcelona’s unique short goal kicks, and Messi’s scoreless streak. It’s all here in this week’s roundup of the action in La Liga.

Villarreal’s inconsistent campaign

Villarreal are having a strange season. They’ve had top-six underlying numbers since the early running but only as of this week held a position inside the top six. With penalties removed from the equation, their goal and expected goal differences match up almost exactly, but the relationship between them has been far from linear.

 

Villarreal La Liga Trendlines (2)

 

Javi Calleja’s side are in the midst of their best run of form of the season. Saturday’s 2–1 win over Levante was their sixth in their last eight matches. But this is actually their second-worst eight-match streak in terms of xG difference. Their best, between matchdays two and nine, yielded six fewer points. They seem to be getting results on the board despite worsening, yet still good, underlying numbers.

They’ve also made some fairly dramatic changes to their approach as the campaign has gone on. As these comparison radars between their first and second 12 matches show, they’ve become more direct in the way in which they get the ball forward, are entering the box via crosses more often than before and have upped their shot count at the expense of overall quality, albeit while creating a greater number of clear shots (through one-on-ones with the goalkeeper).

 

Villarreal-La Liga-

 

On the defensive side, they’ve become demonstrably more aggressive, pushing their back line up, more regularly contesting possession and becoming less easy to get off shots against in transition. Lower shot volume is offset by increased quality.

 

Villarreal-La Liga- (1)

 

Villarreal are slightly worse off at both ends of the pitch compared to their first 12 matches, but maybe there is something in this adjusted style that is more conducive to getting results on a match-by-match basis? Or maybe they are just enjoying a bit of good fortune?

Yet the distribution of penalties for and against has played a fairly significant role. During the first couple of months of the campaign, they twice dominated away matches only to come away pointless after conceding two penalties on each occasion in defeats to Levante and Mallorca. Their current eight-match run has included three penalties scored and none conceded.

It's unclear how this will ultimately shake out. Villarreal could finish anywhere between third and eighth and any of those outcomes wouldn't feel particularly surprising. Sunday’s match away to Atlético Madrid might just go a fair way toward calibrating their possibilities.

Can Suso reignite stuttering Sevilla?

The race for the top four has tightened considerably over the course of the last 10 matches, with Getafe in third and Real Sociedad in eighth separated by just five points. Sevilla are one of the losers. After taking 1.93 points per match from their first 14 fixtures, they're at just 1.3 per match thereafter, the ninth-best record in the league for that time. Two weeks ago, they lost the top four place they’d held since mid-November.

This despite the fact there's been no material difference in their performances. Their average goal and xG differences remain fairly steady. It’s just that the distribution of those goals now more often results in draws and defeats.

It is the sort of thing likely to right itself. Sevilla are, after all, running about five goals behind expectation. But with their advantage eroded, and other comparably good teams now surrounding them, they can’t afford to just sit around and wait.

Sevilla have suffered from a relative lack of firepower all season. Julen Lopetegui has often been quick to make changes to shore things up once they have the advantage, aware that further goals might not necessarily arrive.

This is the situation the club sought to rectify in January. They first added a quick and direct threat to their attack with the €20 million signing of Youssef En-Nesyri from Leganés. Then, at the end of the window, they committed a further €20 million to the eventual purchase of Suso at the end of his 18-month loan from Milan.

Suso made his second start in Sunday’s 2–2 draw at home to Espanyol and showed off the skills he brings to the side. Swift and creative, he looks a player capable of returning some of the spark Sevilla lost when Pablo Sarabia left for Paris Saint-Germain last summer.

By his own standards, the 26-year-old wasn’t having the best of seasons at Milan.

 

Suso-Serie A-2019_2020

 

But he still comfortably led Serie A in open play passes into the box. That ability to find teammates in advantageous positions was on clear display on Sunday. Suso provided the assist for the first goal, headed home by Lucas Ocampos, and slipped two nice passes into the area for En-Nesyri to get off shots. All in all, he successfully moved the ball into the area on six occasions.

 

IQTactics_Events_Suso_Sevilla__2020-02-16 - 2020-02-16

 

And just as Sevilla seemed likely to come away with nothing, Suso produced his trademark strike, stepping it off the right onto his favoured left foot and firing a low effort into the corner from the edge of the area.

No side in La Liga have been as reliant on crosses as a means of creating shots as Sevilla are this season, and Suso provides a pair of headline attributes that will help vary that. He also gives a more natural and symmetrical shape to their attack, with both him and Ocampos (now on the left) moving infield onto their favoured side to get off shots and provide space for the two full-backs, so important as attacking outlets in Lopetegui’s system, to advance outside.

But will it be enough to get Sevilla back into the Champions League places?

Barcelona’s short goal kicks, and Messi’s goal drought

Two minutes into Barcelona’s 2–1 win at home to Getafe on Saturday, central defender Samuel Umtiti pushed the ball into place before playing a short goal kick to his goalkeeper Marc-André ter Stegen. He, in turn, took four touches forward before pinging a low pass through the centre of the pitch to Antoine Griezmann.

It was the first of six goal kicks taken that way, from central defender to goalkeeper, during the match — three by Umtiti, three by Gerard Piqué.

 

IQTactics_Sequence_Barcelona_For__2020-02-15 - 2020-02-15

 

It was a strange sight, a reversal of the usual order. But when your goalkeeper is as good a passer as ter Stegen, perhaps the play makes sense. It removes a pass from the normal pattern of goalkeeper to defender, defender back to goalkeeper, followed by the goalkeeper’s pass forward, and gives him more time to receive and assess his options before opposition pressure arrives.

It wasn’t the first time Barcelona have performed that routine since Quique Setién took charge. They also did so five times against Levante. It is, though, something unique to them. Across the top five European leagues this season, 49 goal kicks have been taken by outfield players; only Barcelona’s have had a goalkeeper as the recipient.

Elsewhere at the Camp Nou, Lionel Messi is on a four-match scoreless streak in the league — his longest in over six years. It’s probably nothing to worry about — he’s provided six assists in that time and is still getting himself into scoring positions on a regular basis.

 

Lionel Messi La Liga 2019_2020 (2)

 

It just looks like one of those runs every player goes through from time to time. Even Messi.

Header image courtesy of the Press Association

Who can capitalise on Manchester City's Champions League ban?

Well, that certainly happened. UEFA’s decision to ban Manchester City from European competition for two seasons may well be overturned. It could be suspended. But for now, though, it appears that the fifth-place team in England will play Champions League football next year. This has really opened up the race for what is now the top five. Let’s look at how the contenders stand in this new paradigm.

Leicester City

They’re nearly there. Leicester are eleven points clear of Sheffield United in sixth place. It’s extremely likely that Champions League football will return to the King Power Stadium. The more reasonable question is whether the Foxes will just cruise through the rest of the season or make it look dicey. And they’ve spent the start of this calendar year trying to make it look dicey. As the xG trendline above shows, Leicester’s season so far can be broken into three sections. Back in the autumn, the Foxes were not playing great football, but finishing at both ends broke their way and they picked up some good results. Then in November and December, performances improved in a big way, even as they continued to get the bounce of the conversion rates. As I wrote at the time, “This is the form the Foxes need to put up a title challenge”. Of course this form was, as they say, temporary. The performances have now deteriorated to autumn levels, but this time the finishing gods aren’t quite on their side. This could all be moot, anyway. Leicester probably won't need that many more points to qualify for the Champions League. Plan your European trips, Leicester fans, even if the team ends up merely limping across the finish line.

Chelsea

The biggest question for the Blues this season is how many times I can write “Chelsea are fine” before drop enough points that I lose all credibility. But again, Chelsea have been a good side all season, even if their finishing tells a different story. The Blues are all of two points clear of sixth, so they’re going to need to play their way into the Champions League. The good news is that they have the best numbers of any team in this race, with an expected goal difference per game closer to Liverpool than Leicester. Even when taking into account that goalkeeping is an issue, they’re still conceding more than the numbers imply. The bad news is that they’re really picking up injuries. Tammy Abraham, Callum Hudson-Odoi and Christian Pulisic have all been nursing various niggles this season, and that’s a lot of attack to lose. N’Golo Kante has now picked up a knock, and he’s quite good at football. If I were to predict a team here to pick up a lot of points before the end of the season, it would be Chelsea. But at the same time, they’re going to need to hope those injuries clear up, as otherwise what looked like a promising season could blow up in their faces.

Tottenham

José' a comin’. Since Mourinho’s arrival in November, Spurs have taken a strong 26 points from 14 games, putting them behind only Manchester City and Liverpool (by a large margin) over this period. Suddenly they’re right where they want to be in fifth place, although just a point ahead of Sheffield United. Spurs were a catastrophe at the end of Pochettino’s reign and Mourinho really has improved them. But has he improved them enough? Their xG difference per game since the new manager's arrival is just +0.31, which is less than Chelsea, Southampton (!), Leicester and Wolves (as well as the top two). Spurs have lacked Harry Kane since New Year’s Day, but this hasn’t hurt the attack too much, with the xG created per game actually increasing in his absence. The problem now is with Son Heung-min out for the season, Tottenham are running rather thin on attackers. If Mourinho can rely on Dele Alli, Steven Bergwijn and Erik Lamela behind Lucas Moura, it might be enough. With Giovani Lo Celso improving circulation of the ball through midfield, Spurs might be stumbling onto something, but it’s still hard to feel they’re at more than a toss-up for Champions League qualification.

Sheffield United

Above Manchester United and they haven’t even had to beat xG that much to do it. Look, the Blades are good. What we’re asking here is at another level, however. The team's success has been built on a solid defence, with their 1.15 xG conceded per game bettered in no small part due to Dean Henderson’s excellent form. An unimpressive 1.16 xG per game in attack can be forgiven considering where most of this squad were a year ago. I’d love to be proven wrong here, but it does seem like Chris Wilder is currently getting the absolute maximum out of these players. An almost dead even xG difference can be enough to power a side to a top-half finish at times, but to finish higher you do need a little more oomph. United will have to up their performance level to do it.

Manchester United

As joyless a phrase as it might be, you can’t outperform your xG forever. Each of Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, Mourinho and Louis van Gaal had a period at Manchester United when they really crushed the metrics to earn themselves an extended stay, and each eventually saw things come back down to earth to push them out the door. As of right now, the Red Devils are chugging along, moderately under their xG, but as a football team that just kind of . . . exists. Apologies to Odion Ighalo, but the real question for the rest of United's season is about what Bruno Fernandes can do. The very, very early returns are interesting. Fernandes is already beating every other United player not named Paul Pogba in deep progressions per 90. He’s also leading in shots per 90 with a horrific selection of locations. It’s extremely early days, but a month ago no one would have been surprised to see him produce this shot map. Solskjaer has coached a good defensive side, with their 0.97 xG conceded per 90 level with Liverpool. The problem has been the lack of any forward impetus in possession. If Fernandes can be that man and give this side a creative passing outlet, he could lead them into the Champions League.

Wolves

It was a fun three weeks at the start of the season when people thought Wolves could go down. Now they’re pushing for a Champions League place. The way Wolves do it is with a mean defence built through a compact shape without the ball. Their 0.93 xG conceded per game is third-best in the division, above even Liverpool. This does come at a cost, and their 1.18 xG created is, as middling as middling can be, tenth best. This is part of why Adama Traore has been so effective: Wolves sit very deep to allow players like him space to run into. Because they're not often seen by the opposition as a “big club”, they don’t have to deal with breaking down deep blocks as frequently as many of the other sides here. Wolves have performed very similarly to Manchester United this season, but it feels like there’s a little less upside for them. They know how they want to play and do it well, which leaves less room for sudden improvement. Nuno Espirito Santo’s side need to rely on teams above them stagnating to pull it off.

Everton

The good news is that the Toffees really have put in some big performances since Carlo Ancelotti arrived. The bad news is that the schedule has been a huge factor here. Of the eight games Everton have played under Ancelotti, seven were against sides currently in the bottom half of the table. And that’s all about to change. Of the remaining twelve fixtures, only three are against bottom-half teams. Shit’s about to get real.  While the attack has sparkled, what worries is that the Italian’s defence has produced a mediocre 1.13 xG conceded so far, against well below average opposition. Against much stronger opponents, there’s a real risk that they could get carved open in a way they haven’t so far. Things really need to break Everton’s way for them to reach the Champions League.

Arsenal

Take the name “Arsenal” away from the club and they wouldn’t make the cut for this article. That’s where we’re at with the Gunners. Arenal are currently tenth in the Premier League, but what’s worse is they’re playing like it. Their xG difference per game of -0.01 is, well, you can figure out it’s very close to zero. Mikel Arteta has not substantively improved the performances, but he’s in it for the long term. The best thing for Arsenal’s relaunch might be a season completely out of Europe.

StatsBomb Champions League Primer: Tottenham Hotspur vs RB Leipzig and Atalanta vs Valencia

The Champions League rolls on and so do our previews.

Tottenham Hotspur vs RB Leipzig

Spurs are running desperately low on shots. It’s not just Harry Kane, now Son Heung-min is also sidelined. Although José Mourinho might have some tricks up his sleeve, to us mortals his sleeve seems to hold only Lucas Moura, Dele Alli, Erik Lamela and Steven Bergwijn as natural front four players, though Ryan Sessegnon, Giovani Lo Celso or Tanguy Ndombele could theoretically be pushed up the field. Regardless, none of those players are particularly prolific shooters. Lamela and Moura are both at the top of the list, though Lamela’s 2.21 shots per 90 minutes are from extremely limited minutes while Moura’s are simply not an impressive return for a player who has spent significant minutes functioning as a striker. Bergwijn hasn’t yet played 600 minutes for Spurs, so he doesn’t make the chart, but he was at 2.19 per 90 in the easier Eredivisie with PSV Eindhovern. It’s possible that Spurs will be ably to get by simply by spreading all the shots around, but that’s a pretty big ask against a very good RB Leipzig team. Of course, Mourinho has experience scuttling more talented teams in the Champions League. Perhaps the most relevant place to look for inspiration is the first year of his second stint with Chelsea. He reached the semifinals of the Champions League despite the fact that the only two true strikers at his disposal were a mostly washed out Samuel Eto’o and a mostly injured Fernando Torres. So, Spurs fans can take heart that stranger things have, in fact, happened. If Mourinho’s history is any guide, he will attempt to muddy up the game and nip a goal on the counter, first and foremost denying control of the midfield to Leipzig. If that fails, he'll hope his side will be able to absorb sustained pressure. For Leipzig this likely means they’ll have to find alternate avenues to get into dangerous positions. Luckily for them, they have Timo Werner. It’s not just his obvious goal-scoring ability, but the fact that he’s equally superb at providing an outlet on the wings to receive the ball and turn and run in space. Here are all the successful passes played from Leipzig’s own half that Werner's received in the opposition half. Don’t be surprised if Spurs work hard to take away Leipzig’s ability to combine in midfield, forcing the German side to turn toward springing Werner over the top and in behind Spurs right back Serge Aurier. It’s nice when you can rely on a player who is both an expert goal scorer and an elite ball mover on the wing.

Atalanta v Valencia

Valencia has a longer Champions League pedigree than Atalanta; they’ve been in the competition five times in the last decade (though they've only made it to the knockout rounds twice, and never past the first round). Meanwhile, this is Atalanta’s first trip down this long and treacherous road. That, however, fundamentally masks the nature of this matchup. This Atalanta team is simply much better than this Valencia side. In Serie A this season Atalanta sit comfortably in fourth. They might be significantly behind the top three, 12 points off first place Juventus and 9 behind third-place Inter Milan, but the side’s stats suggest they are good enough that in other years they’d be in contention for the Scudetto. In fact, Atalanta has by far the best non-penalty xG difference in Serie A. Most impressively, Atalanta have added a strong defense to the attacking juggernaut that carried them to the upper reaches of the table over the past few seasons. Only Juventus have a stingier record when it comes to xG conceded. This isn’t the profile of a team that is just be happy to be here. Rather, Atalanta look prepared to dispatch a much weaker opponent as they gear up for stiffer challenges deeper in the tournament. In part, that’s because Valencia are simply not a good side at the moment. They sit seventh in La Liga, tied with Villarreal on 38 points, but the stats suggest that position strongly flatters them. They have one of the worst non-penalty xG differences in the league. The side’s attack is average, but on defense they are simply absolutely terrible, the second-worst team in La Liga in xG conceded. This is, uh, not a sustainable defensive approach. Valencia take dropping deep and defending their own penalty area to extremes. They manage to not give up many truly dangerous shots, holding opponents to below 0.10 xG per shot on average. However, they simply give up one too many attempts — even if those attempts are mediocre — conceding almost 15 shots a game on average, the second-most in La Liga. Giving an elite attacking side like Atalanta carte blanche to attack the penalty area is not likely going to end well for this Valencia team. Sports are awesome and unsure and no result is guaranteed, but what is overwhelmingly likely is that Atalanta are going to take the game to Valencia, and Valencia will have to hold on for dear life and hope for an unlikely chance to steal some points against the run of play.

StatsBomb Champions League Primer: Atlético Madrid vs Liverpool and Borussia Dortmund vs Paris Saint-Germain

The Champions League is back. With four games on the slate this week, let’s take a quick around a few salient statistical things likely to be happening on the pitch.

Atlético Madrid v Liverpool

Atléti hasn’t struggled as much this season as the narrative surrounding them might suggest. And while Liverpool are one of the favorites to win the Champions League (again) their performances also haven’t quite lived up to their otherworldly return (though, really, could any team in history have ever gone on such an extreme winning run as Liverpool without a nice heaping dollop of luck scooped on top of a truly great team?). In theory, this match should be a closer one than it might seem on paper. Digging into the stats, however, shows two teams whose numbers line up in a curious way. One of the mysteries of Liverpool’s season has been just how good they’ve been at set pieces. From direct and indirect free kicks, as well as throw-ins and corner kicks, they've scored 12 goals from 7.04 expected goals. Again, in theory, it's true that tight execution and well-conceived set-piece design can let a team run a bit ahead of expectation on set pieces, but figuring out exactly how much of Liverpool’s achievement is an accurate reflection of execution versus a sprinkling of good fortune is devilishly difficult Similarly, even if we attribute a slice of those goals to being excellent at what they do, historically speaking, it's just a matter of time before defenses adjust and Liverpool’s edge will have to be generated anew from different strategies. Most years, you’d expect this Liverpool strength to be countered by Atlético Madrid’s own strength. After all, a big rugged defense and strong set-piece defending are Diego Simeone's calling card. However, that's not been the case this season. In fact, Atléti have conceded nine times from set pieces this season. On the one hand, that number isn’t quite as bad as it seems. They’ve only conceded 6.86 xG, so there’s some bad luck hovering above them (though even that 6.86 figure is a disappointing total for a Simeone side). On the other hand, a whole heck of a lot of that bad luck seems to fall directly at the hands (and feet, and incredibly long arms) of superstar keeper Jan Oblak. Despite his formidable track record, Oblak is having a relatively poor season — he's allowed two more goals than an average keeper would given the shots on goal he’s faced. Break out the set pieces and something even more surprising jumps out. Oblak is his usual stellar self during open play, but he’s conceded a whopping 4.29 goals more from set pieces more than expected from an average keeper. How much of that is a true reflection of his poor play and how much is a knock-on effect from a team struggling to defend is up for debate. Either way, it’s an eye-popping number Ultimately a match with two strong defensive sides means this tie could well come down to set pieces. And, if so, Liverpool will likely have the edge.

Borussia Dortmund v Paris Saint-Germain

These two teams are excruciatingly difficult to analyze in the proper context. Stats rely on aggregates and there are reasons to believe the aggregate totals of both PSG and Dortmund are not necessarily an accurate reflection of where they are in the current moment. Dortmund have recently undergone a tactical evolution. More than ever they’re playing like a prototypical Lucien Favre side, mixing conservative possession with moments of quick attack into space. It also helps that they have the best two teenagers in the world in Jaden Sancho and Erling Håland, both of whom are playing with the amp turned up to 11. Since returning from the midseason break, Dortmund have yet to score fewer than three goals in a match, though they’ve also faced relatively easy opponents. Their only match against a side in the top half of the table was a 4–3 loss away to Bayer Leverkusen. The question is whether  Dortmund will be able to maintain their improved attacking statistics against top-level competition or whether the numbers of the last six weeks can be attributed to a weak schedule. If they can exploit the openings PSG will likely leave them, then occasionally they'll manage to hang with the favored side. PSG, on the other hand, face the same problem season in and season out. They are simply so much better than other Ligue 1 teams that it is impossible to get a true impression of how they will fare against stronger competition. Dortmund are at least the second-best team PSG have played this season (depending on how you interpret Dortmund’s form now and Madrid’s form at the beginning of the year, arguably they’re the best). On the other hand, as always, PSG has Kylian Mbappé putting up these numbers, And Neymar putting up these numbers. Thomas Tuchel runs a team that wants the ball, needs the ball and uses the ball in midfield to create great chances for the side’s superstars in the box. They aren’t obsessed with taking a lot of shots, but they are obsessed with taking the best ones. If things go wrong it will be because Dortmund manage to thwart that plan by counterattacking into the space that PSG’s extensive and highly aggressive possession leaves available. If PSG’s domestic season is any indication they will be just fine. This attacking radar simply outweighs any concerns. The problem is that it's simply been so long since PSG has faced competition the caliber of Dortmund that it's hard to weigh how meaningful that awesome radar is. While PSG's numbers suggest Dortmund shouldn't beat them, it's quite possible those numbers aren't reliable.

The best Serie A team that you (probably) don’t know are Hellas Verona

Hellas Verona are 6th in Serie A and unbeaten in 2020. They conceded just 4 goals in the 8 games they played since the start of the year, a streak that saw them leave San Siro (AC Milan 1–1 Hellas Verona) and the Olimpico (Lazio 0–0 Hellas Verona) undefeated, while handing Juventus their third league loss of the season. An amazing result for a club that was in Serie B last season and spent just €11.2 million in the summer, the third-lowest amount in the Italian top-tier.

One of the main architects of the team's success is certainly the coach, Ivan Jurić. After being fired from Genoa three times in a row, the Croatian coach accepted President Maurizio Setti's offer in the summer, and at the helm of the Gialloblu, he managed to revive a career that seemed already compromised, establishing himself as one of the most brilliant coaches in Serie A.

Jurić was one of the iconic players of Gian Piero Gasperini's Genoa — a team he brought up to Serie A in 2006 and secured a Europa League spot with just three seasons later — and his former coach was a real mentor to him. Although he has gone his own way, his football resembles that of the current Atalanta coach, using man-marking and a three-man defense, as well as instilling a remarkable playing intensity with and without the ball. 

Verona’s passes per defensive action (PPDA) is the 4th best in the league at 8.38 (87th percentile), and they're 4th in the Serie A in opposition passing percentage (78%). They also defend far from their goal (46.54, 5th in the league), at the same average distance as Atalanta (46.60).

Hellas’ favored system of play is the 3-4-2-1: the two attacking midfielders (Mattia Zaccagni, Matteo Pessina or Valerio Verre) occupy the half-spaces and try to hinder the opposing team’s build-up from the first few passes, creating central density with the collaboration of the two holding midfielders, always very aggressive. Midfielders Miguel Veloso (22.13) and Sofyian Amrabat (18.90) average the most pressures for their team. Veloso, whom Jurić coached at Genoa and was thought not very dynamic, has surprised many with his contribution in the defensive phase. He also averages a team-best 4.97 pressure regains (93rd percentile for midfielders in the top 5 leagues).

Their pressing aims to direct the ball to the sidelines, where it's easier to try to recover the ball. Although the wingbacks often push higher up to press, when the opponent's build-up goes wide, the midfielders shift toward the position of the ball. That's a significant distinction compared to Atalanta: in Gasperini’s schemes, the wingbacks are more aggressive and man-oriented. However, the central defenders leaving their position to follow their direct opponents even in the opposing midfield remains common. Marash Kumbulla, Amir Rrahmani, and Koray Günter shine for their intuition, physicality and anticipation.

Verona's defense is the fourth-best in the league, so much so that Jurić's team has conceded only one more goal than Juventus (24 against 23). They also share with the Bianconeri the ability to concede low-quality chances:  the Gialloblu and the league leader average the lowest value of the league in xG per shot (0.07, 98th percentile in the top 5), a particularly notable achievement for a team that presses so aggressively.

When they can't recover the ball higher up the pitch, Verona are able to regroup in the last 16 meters, maintaining an attitude that is anything but passive and continuing to defend with relative intensity, as shown by their defensive activity map. Despite not being able to suppress the volume of the opponent's shots, they are excellent at avoiding box penetration; their opponents average 6 shots per game from outside the box, just 15.50 dribbles per game (3rd in the league) and a below-average amount of passes inside the box (2.26). All in all, Verona’s defense is formidable. However, it's perhaps also running somewhat hot, conceding around 10 goals less than expected.

Although the defensive phase remains the main asset of the team, their offensive performance has gradually increased and it’s now supporting the team's results as much as their strong defense.

Interestingly, the offensive production improved in the last few games when Jurić decided not to deploy a pure striker, switching to a strikerless system.  Verona embraced the motto quality over quantity, to the extent that they are only 18th in shots (11.54) but third in expected goals per shot (0.10). A rather unique feature, especially considering that Verona is a newly promoted team, is the fact that they don’t have a landmark striker. Samuel Di Carmine (756 minutes played) is the only pure forward to feature in the team's xG ranking among players with at least 600 minutes played, with a haul of just 2.41 xG.

Di Carmine and Valerio Verre are the only players with at least 600 minutes played to average at least 2 shots per 90 minutes. Nevertheless, Verona is also the only team in Serie A that can count on at least 4 players with an average xG/shot of 0.15. Jurić is reminding fans that in modern football the concept of a defined "role" is outdated, often placing midfielder Verre at the center of the attack.

  Verona compensate for their lack of a striker by attacking in numbers. When they beat Juventus a week ago, in certain situations the team actually lined up with a 3-2-5. They rely on the rotations and runs of the three offensive players, whoever they are, as well as on the ability of the two wingbacks, Davide Faraoni and Darko Lazović, to create opportunities from the flanks.

Just as there is no primary finisher, ball progression responsibilities are evenly distributed among the central midfielders, offering Verona multiple options to gain territory. For example, Veloso has a vertical and aggressive passing style, while Amrabat prefers to move the ball between zones through dribbles and carries. Verre, Matteo Pessina, Mattia Zaccagni, and Veloso all average roughly 11 final third open-play passes each.

Including penalties, their attack has scored only one more goal (28) than the Serie A current top scorer, Ciro Immobile. Yet despite not being a prolific team, Verona's strength is their ability to not have to rely on one or two key players at an offensive level, but to create opportunities and finalize them with different players. Excluding goalkeepers, 15 players have played at least 350 minutes this season and 13 scored at least one goal. Overall, their performance in front of goal could be better, as suggested by their expected goals. So, while they've been running above expectations on the defensive side, they're actually below expectation in attack, suggesting that, if anything, their goal-scoring is likely to improve over the remainder of the season.

With an average xG difference of just 0.21, Verona is only 11th in Serie A, but their improvement has been steady and consistent. Over the last 9 games, they've finished with a positive xG difference on 7 occasions, while away games at AC Milan and Lazio their xG difference was only slightly negative (-0.51 and -0.10). That's a crucial indicator for their hopes of qualifying for the Europa League, a feat the team will achieve if they remain in sixth.

Looking at future developments for the club, one cannot help but notice the team must give up many key players as early as next summer.

Amrabat, bought in the summer from Club Brugge for just €3.5 million, has already been sold to Fiorentina for around €20 million. The 23-year-old, physically imposing, strong tackling midfielder offers an essential contribution to team pressing. But he is also capable of making himself invaluable in the offensive phase, thanks to his ability to carry the ball and beat his direct opponent to open space in midfield.

Another important player Verona is already sure to give up is center back Rrahmani: Napoli bought him for €14 million after the Gialloblu purchased him from Dinamo Zagreb for just €2.1 million. He is tall and good at aerial duels, but also very fast, and his decision-making has been really good this season, both on and off the ball. One might even think that Napoli brought him in to replace Kalidou Koulibaly, who despite missing a number of games through injury may be wooed away this summer.

Fellow centre-back Marash Kumbulla, who grew up in the club's academy, is a name already on everyone's lips. At each match, countless scouts from major international clubs watch him from the stands. Just 20, he's very strong physically and is the most aggressive of Verona’s defenders, with a great sense for individual duels that he wins at a 75% clip.

His price tag is already over €20 million and it is likely that these are the last few months playing for the team that developed him. He is not very fast and has yet to show what he can do with the ball at his feet, as his contribution to the build-up is not impressive; however, at his age he has plenty of room for improvement.

Verona zigged while every other newly promoted team of the last few seasons zagged. Distributing responsibilities among players who have committed to their coach’s ideas, adopting a courageous style of play and applying tactical and strategic concepts that improve efficiency (at a level that might even suggest the use of analytics) should be fundamental principles for any team that wants to survive in the league or to punch above their weight.

Next season's team could be radically different, but this return to the top tier has been a success for the club's finances, too. It is not easy to do overachieve for two seasons in a row, but by maintaining the same principles that have guided this extraordinary season, both on the field and in the transfer market, the club can consolidate their position in the top half of the Serie A standings.

Are the Foxes at risk of getting caught? 

After a scintillating start to the season Leicester City have hit a rough patch in the race for the top four. And as results have worsened, so have the team's metrics. Back in August, when some felt Leicester might rip apart the top six, nobody could have imagined it would be this easy. Even Wolves and Sheffield United have kept up with Manchester United and Tottenham, while keeping Arsenal in the rearview mirror, and Leicester have long set their sights higher than just stalking the Champions League spots. Earlier, a spot in the top four did seem to be almost a formality. But that is no longer the case. Having started out with draws against Wolves and Chelsea, Leicester went on a run of 12 wins in 14 league games to storm into second place. By the second week of December, their only defeats had been at Manchester United (1–0) and Liverpool (2–1). They were on a run of eight wins in a row. They had shipped 10 goals, the fewest in the division. The Foxes were 14 points clear of United in fifth. Anyone who kept half an eye on the stats knew Leicester were exceeding the metrics, but had no idea when they would begin to slow down, or, when they did, how badly would they struggle. But the Great Leicester Run stopped on 14 December with a 1–1 draw at home to Norwich, and the team now have just three wins in nine. Their efficiency and their underlying metrics have both declined. During the first 16 games Leicester had a goal difference of 1.81 per game with an expected goal difference of 0.81. To exceed that metric by a goal per game over such a long period is unusual. Since then they have had a goal difference of -0.11 with an xG difference of -0.24. Even in hard times, Leicester have managed to outperform their metrics. Yet the falloff spells trouble. Any analysis of why Leicester are wobbling must begin with Jamie Vardy. The striker had a hot streak in autumn, scoring 13 goals from an xG of 8.48 (penalties excluded). That kind of efficiency is hard to maintain for anyone not named Lionel Messi (and usually for people named Lionel Messi, too), and Vardy has since lost his sharpness, scoring once from an xG of 1.50. Just in case anyone doubted whether his fortunes really had changed, Vardy missed a penalty at Burnley just before the Clarets struck the winner. And Vardy is not only missing chances, he's getting fewer of them. The same goes for Leicester as a team. While they produced few big chances in their first games, they did face strong teams during that spell and still managed to exceed their metrics. When the schedule got easier, they took off. Since then two things have happened. First, they've stopped playing way ahead of their xG. Second, the underlying metrics have themselves nosedived. What happened? Given what we know about Vardy, it feels natural to begin this exploration by examining the attack. Brendan Rodgers made only minor changes to his set-up, benching the odd out-of-form player and alternating between a 4-3-3 and 4-4-2 diamond. They've had no major injuries; while Vardy has missed two games, Leicester have won them both. Neither personnel nor tactics offer any clear answer as to why the attack has worsened in almost every aspect. The standout metric here is the shots after counter-attacks. You would think teams would've have wised up to Vardy’s runs in behind the defence. Yet in a spell where Leicester spends less time in the lead, it would make sense if opponents defend deeper to protect their leads. In any case, the attack is not been the biggest problem for Leicester. Before the Norwich draw they had conceded two goals in seven league games. They've now shipped 16 goals in 9 games. And as for the defensive metrics, well… Where to start? The fixtures offer some consolation: during this spell Leicester have played City at the Etihad, plus Liverpool, Chelsea and a galvanised Southampton. Yet two matches against West Ham and a rout of 10-man Newcastle should have provided some balance. There have been no significant injuries in defence, although midfielder Wilfred Ndidi was sidelined in January due to a knee operation and has started none of the last five league games. His absence has surely played a part, given his defensive output. Still, a collective decline of this scale cannot be down to one player. Going back to the radar of horror, two metrics have declined more than others. One is set-piece xG conceded, which has jumped from 0.17 to 0.38 per game. Leicester have conceded four set-piece goals in their last nine games, based on an xG of 3.64 and 27 shots. Not good. The other metric is xG per shot conceded, which has increased from 0.09 to 0.13. If we look at the shots Leicester allowed from close range during their golden autumn, hardly any took place inside the six-yard box. Such was their aerial dominance and ability to stop crosses that they did not have to block a single shot inside this area. Since then, however, Leicester have given up a slew of shots from within six yards. Time will tell whether Leicester will halt this wobbly spell. In any case, it looks unlikely to derail their season given they're 10 points clear of fifth place. After upcoming games against Wolves and City, they have four matches they're expected to win. None of their top-four rivals are showing signs of putting together a decent run, and should one of them suddenly get it together, Chelsea would surely be the first team to get caught. Rodgers will surely be thankful that, in this particular season, stable form is not the norm but the exception.

Serie A's busy January transfer window is not just about Zlatan

According to Transfermarkt, Serie A clubs spent €214.35 million during the January transfer window, a record that blew apart the €153.90 million spent just a year ago. Four clubs alone (Napoli, Inter, Fiorentina, and Juventus, who only bought Parma’s sensation Dejan Kulusevski) invested about 70% of that amount. But let's take a look at the teams that have made moves that should be relevant to the outcome of this season and, perhaps never as much as before, to future ones.

AC Milan

AC Milan’s January market campaign marked an important transition; they sold two of the most important players in the squad, Krzysztof Piątek and Suso, and continued with the cost reduction policy they adopted last summer. To make a long story short: five first-team players left and five less expensive and/or more suitable players arrived. The club made a €24 million profit. To replace the Polish forward, who left for Herta Berlin for a fee of €27 million, came none other than superstar free agent Zlatan Ibrahimović. At 38, his return is definitely considered a short-term boost, but one that has had an extremely positive effect on AC Milan's season; they collected 11 points in the first 5 games after his return, before losing to Inter in the Milan Derby. The club adopted a completely different strategy to replace Suso, who went to Sevilla on loan with an obligation to buy on the fulfillment of certain conditions that have not been officially disclosed. 20-year-old Alexis Saelemaekers came in on loan from Anderlecht with a right of purchase after this season. Like Suso, he is a right-winger, but compared to the Spaniard he is equally skilled with both feet, and can also play as a fullback.  He was one of the best dribblers in the Belgian first division, and despite not being a household name like Ibra, he's a good prospect that can potentially be a strong alternative to both Ante Rebić and Andrea Conti.  Chief football officer Zvonimir Boban and technical director Paulo Maldini offloaded Ricardo Rodríguez and Pepe Reina and replaced them by bringing in Asmir Begović on loan and calling back Diego Laxalt from Torino. Finally, after a series of injuries that compromised his career at AC Milan, Mattia Caldara returned to Bergamo where he had done so well, while Simon Kjaer, barely played by Atalanta coach Gian Piero Gasperini, took the opposite route.

Napoli

Napoli's Serie A season is now seriously compromised, if not already over, and Aurelio De Laurentiis' club's winter campaign is just the preamble to an upcoming revolution that will be carried out in the summer. Carlo Ancelotti, who preferred a fluid 4-4-2, was replaced by his former player Gennaro Gattuso. The former AC Milan coach immediately shifted to 4-3-3, but with only four midfielders on the roster, he requested the arrival of two reinforcements. Sporting director Cristiano Giuntoli brought in both Diego Demme and Stanislav Lobotka. Demme, named after Napoli legend Diego Maradona, contributed immediately, offering stability to his new team’s build-up play. Albeit from a very small sample (2.7 90s), he is the Napoli player with the highest xG build-up.  He also immediately put his engine to work to help the team's defense, offering Gattuso another midfielder with ball-winning potential besides Allan, who has played a minor role this season and could leave in July, as could Fabián Ruiz. Considering they paid just €12 million (plus bonuses), Demme is a great purchase for a Napoli team desperate for a midfielder of his kind. On the other hand, the signing of Lobotka, for which they paid a starting fee of €20M, plus €4 million in potential bonuses — pretty much double the price of Demme — isn't as impressive. During the last two seasons at Celta Vigo, Lobotka clearly has not developed into a better player, nor does he represent an upgrade on the rest of their midfielders. If Napoli were looking for a number 8 able to consolidate possession, Lobotka fits the profile, but for that amount of money, they could have found better alternatives next summer. Napoli also signed Inter’s Matteo Politano for €25 million. The Italian winger is potentially a replacement for both José Callejón and Dries Mertens, who at this point seem sure to leave, but in reality, his profile is more that of a lite Lorenzo Insigne. If we look at his 2018–19 output (Conte barely used him this season), he's just about average at dribbling, tends to shoot the ball often (you can decide if this is a positive for a winger) and is quite good at creating chances for his teammates. His spell at Inter was not particularly positive and it remains to be seen if playing on the opposite side of Insigne will enhance or hinder his play. As the icing on the cake, Napoli also purchased Hellas Verona centre back Amir Rahmani and SPAL striker Andrea Petagna for a combined fee of €31 million, but despite being potentially useful to the struggling side, they were both loaned back to their former teams until next season.

Inter

From September onwards Antonio Conte has not missed an opportunity to stress how weak he believes the depth of his roster was, ensuring those higher up knew of his displeasure. He was basically looking forward to new players coming in the January window. Considering the limited resources available due to FFP, CEO Giuseppe Marotta and technical director Piero Ausilio did their utmost, bringing in Ashley Young, Victor Moses and, most importantly, Christian Eriksen. Commenting on the arrivals of the two Brits, Conte said 'They are certainly not two Real Madrid starters', but their transition to Italian football should be quick, considering that wingback is the easiest role to play in his 3-5-2 (a clear blow to Valentino Lazaro, who was supposed to be the first choice in the role, but was loaned to Newcastle after six difficult months). Thus far they fit quite well, with one assist each already.  Compared to the €23 million paid for Lazaro, both are low-risk investments: Young signed a six-month contract after leaving Manchester United on a free, while Moses was brought in from Chelsea on a six-month loan deal with an option to buy. And then there's Eriksen, the most exciting transfer of the window, whom they financed by selling Politano to Napoli. Surely one could argue whether paying €20 million in January for a player available for free in June is a smart move, but it's certain that Inter brought in a high-profile midfielder outmaneuvering potential competitors. Although he doesn't have an obvious role in Conte's 3-5-2 and he played as attacking midfielder in the only game he started in Serie A so far, he could be the high-level creative number 8 that Inter desperately need so the forwards don't need to rely on their own ability to create a high volume of shots. Given the gap in points with Juventus is now closed, Eriksen is a weapon who could now help close the gap in quality, paving the way for Inter to truly have a shot at the scudetto.

Fiorentina

Fiorentina, who had a startingly good run of form at the beginning of the season, was the most active team this winter, buying 6 players and splashing €70 million. They rolled the dice on these players, who could very well bring either future profit or add years of strength to their new team. La Viola's first coup was the return to Italy of Patrick Cutrone, who left Wolverhampton after just six months. He played few minutes in the Premier League, although his numbers in a very small sample are excellent. After going strikerless under Vincenzo Montella, newly appointed coach Beppe Iachini favored a more traditional approach, which shaped their market moves. After Cutrone, another striker, Christian Kouamé, joined from Genoa, although due to a serious knee injury, his debut won’t come that soon. The 22-year-old is not a forward who shoots a lot, but he is strong in aerial duels and also very fast and able to run into space. He might, therefore, be suitable to play alongside a pure striker such as Cutrone or Dušan Vlahović, or near a less conventional attack partner like Federico Chiesa. Owner Rocco Commisso also splashed out for Alfred Duncan, in the hope, he will offer more consistency in midfield than the evanescent Marco Benassi, and Igor Julio, a fast and technical centreback from SPAL, one of the few players who shone for the bottom-table team. Fiorentina also beat out Napoli for Sofyan Amrabat's signature, although having played with Club Brugge and Hellas Verona this season, he'll be unable to play in this campaign, But the best transfer may be that of Kevin Agudelo. The loanee from Genoa is a versatile and dynamic midfielder who can play practically all midfield roles and on the right flank as well and could develop into an aggressive zone mover.

Two transfers to watch

This could end with a discussion on Verona's choice to sell two of its best players in January while keeping them until June, or a look at Genoa's Back to the Future transfer plan (they brought in, almost exclusively, only players who had already played with them), but I thought instead I'd leave you with two transfers to keep an eye on instead. Musa Barrow is not new to the league, moving to Bologna from Atalanta to function as a starter for the Rossoblu. In his first three seasons as a professional, he has been an outlier in pretty much every relevant metric for a striker. Playing as a substitute and playing for Atalanta are surely two big reasons why, but his own traits shape the numbers, too. His time at Bologna already looks promising — in his first start he scored two goals against Roma — and has the potential to be one of the best strikers in the league. Bologna's sporting director, that old dog Walter Sabatini, snapped him up for €13 million. Meanwhile, Cagliari brought in Gastón Pereiro from PSV. The Uruguayan trequartista almost never saw the pitch this season due to a collarbone injury and a contract renewal that never came through. However, he had very good offensive production last season. Elite numbers in the Eredivise are not necessarily a guarantee of success in a top league, but the Sardinian club paid him just €2 million. It seems well worth the risk.   Header image courtesy of the Press Association

Weekly La Liga Roundup: Isak breaks through at Real Sociedad, Cucurella is perfect for Getafe and more

The various qualities of Alexander Isak, Mallorca’s identity crisis, Marc Cucurella’s role at Getafe and the lack of shots this season. Read on for this week’s update on La Liga.

Isak Takes His Chance

Willian José probably wishes he never agitated for a move away from Real Sociedad. In doing so, he opened the door to Alexander Isak, who strolled in, made himself at home and changed the locks. The 20-year-old has scored in each of his last six matches in all competitions, raking up eight goals in that time. After a double in La Real’s 4–3 win away to Real Madrid in the Copa del Rey quarter-final, Isak again produced a decisive contribution in their victory over Athletic Bilbao in the Basque derby on Sunday. He replaced José early in the second half, set up the first goal for Portu and scored the late winner himself. Isak’s output to date shows that he is capable of matching the shot output of his more experienced colleague. But he also provides a range of other attributes. Alexander Isak-La Liga-2019_2020 He does more work when out of possession, supplies more creative output, and offers individual explosiveness to the attack with his speed and skill. He has the ability to take players on and then advance rapidly into the resulting space, as this map of his successful dribbles and subsequent carries illustrates. That just isn’t José’s game. Can Isak continue to reinvigorate a side whose league form has been patchy over the last couple of months? If he can, Borussia Dortmund retain a €30 million buyback option they might just decide to exercise come the end of the campaign.

What are Mallorca?

We are nearly two-thirds of the way into the season and it still doesn’t really feel like we have a proper handle on what exactly Mallorca are. We know that in terms of performance they are one of the worst teams in the league, by both the table and the underlying numbers. But it is excruciatingly difficult to define them stylistically. Most teams have some sort of identifiable profile by this stage; they just don’t. Mallorca don’t press high, but neither are they particularly effective at sitting deep. They give up an above-average number of above-average shots, and don’t have good numbers goal side when opponents shoot. Their blocked shots rate is one of the lowest in the division. They are passive — easy to play through and relatively easy to create chances against. In attack, it’s the same kind of thing. Even in the bottom half of the table, there are teams who stand out in terms of their shot volume (Espanyol) or quality (Alavés). But Mallorca simply take a below-average number of below-average shots. They are middle of the road in terms of the pace and directness with which they attack. They are dead on the average line in terms of dribbles. Even in relatively esoteric categories like the proportion of shots taken with each body part (left foot, right foot, head, other), they are right there in the middle of the pack. Over the last 10 matches, Vicente Moreno’s side have picked up just four points — five less than any other team. Their underlying numbers aren’t quite that bad, but neither do they provide much cause for optimism. Some of the teams around them are improving, and those with worse numbers have a good advantage over them in terms of points. To some degree, this is simply a case of having less talent. Mallorca are, after all, operating on the lowest budget in La Liga. But both this season and in campaigns past, teams have come up with clearly defined ideas as to how they intend to compete in the top flight. Sides such as Eibar, Getafe and Osasuna have used aggressive pressing to bridge and overcome talent disparities; Leganés have leaned on strong defensive foundations; Mallorca . . . well, they don’t seem to have much to call their own.

Cucurella’s Perfect Fit at Getafe

Marc Cucurella is one of those guys whose overall output doesn’t really stand out amongst the general population. But what he does do well is exactly what Getafe’s system requires of him. José Bordalás’ team are the most aggressive high pressers in La Liga, and Cucurella is the most active of all in that regard, leading the team in both pressures. And pressure regains (pressures that result in a turnover of possession). Not that this should come as much of a surprise. Cucurella led Eibar, La Liga’s other supreme high-pressers, in both categories last season. He is simply a pressing machine — a bundle of condensed energy. While his attacking numbers don’t stand out in the league, within the context of his team, he is one of the most regular assist providers, and his directness on the ball helps them swiftly advance. That was evident in their 3–0 win over Valencia on Saturday, in which he regularly carried the ball forward down the left flank.   Eventually, the Valencia right-back Alessandro Florenzi, undoubtedly fed up at watching that wavy mass of hair swish past him time and again, took retribution with an ugly challenge from behind that resulted in a deserved red card. The victory was Getafe’s fourth in a row, and their seventh in their last ten in the league. During that time, only Real Madrid have accumulated more points. They are third in the table and with other top-four challengers stuttering, Champions League qualification is a real possibility. A key part of their success is that everyone performs exactly the role required of them within the system. Few encapsulate that better than Cucurella.

Shot-Shy La Liga

Last season, shots, goals and expected goals (xG) in La Liga were all down in comparison to 2017–18, and the early running this season hinted at an even more dramatic fall. After 10 matches, all three categories had decreased; the average xG per match was below two (in comparison to 2.14 in 2018–19) and there were 1.8 fewer shots taken per match. As the campaign has gone on, goals have reached almost the same number slotted at this time last season, but shots and xG both remain down by around 5% — in terms of shots, a 1.25 per match difference. If shots and chances are what you equate with entertainment value, then La Liga is the least entertaining of the big five European leagues. There are 1.5 fewer shots per match than in Ligue 1, the second-lowest, and a full 6.25 less than in Serie A, the leader in that respect. Matches in La Liga produce two-thirds of a goal less xG than those in the Bundesliga. The Spanish top flight seems to be going its own way in terms of playing style. On average, its teams defend higher and seek to break up passing chains in opposition territory more often than those in any of the other leagues. That is producing fewer shots, but also a different kind of aesthetic. If that’s your cup of tea, La Liga is the place to be.

Being (lucky and good): Liverpool

Barring something truly unprecedented, Liverpool will win the Premier League this season.

FiveThirtyEight’s model gives Liverpool a greater than 99% chance of lifting the Premier League trophy. Jurgen Klopp’s side is 22 points clear at the top, having won 24 out of 25 games. They've not just done it, they've done it in an astonishing manner. There can be no doubt that what Liverpool does, in purely results terms, is extraordinary.

But there’s been a certain dirty word to emerge recently: luck.

Now, regardless of how good they are, any team setting record-breaking points totals is likely to be at least somewhat “lucky”. It’s a fairly abstract concept, but inevitably some bounces need to go your way to do something amazing. But in a statistical sense, what’s really sparked this debate is expected goals. Take a look at the xG difference table for why.

 

Yeah. Manchester City are comfortably dominating this metric. But let’s head over to the actual goal difference and there’s an obvious shift.

City are scoring and conceding largely as expected, with a goal difference of +36 against an xG difference of +36.80. But Liverpool? Liverpool have gained hugely here, managing a goal difference of +45 against an xG difference of +25.09. The overperformance is split fairly evenly between both sides of the ball. Let’s start with the defensive end.

 

Liverpool have conceded nearly ten goals fewer than expected. With two different goalkeepers. But looking at one area in particular reveals an extremely good run.

The Reds have conceded just once from more than 21 yards. The goal in question was a quickly taken free kick straight after a rusty, unprepared Adrián was rushed on and thrust between the sticks. Despite plenty of opportunities, no opposing player has had a moment where he's been able to strike a ball perfectly from range.

Liverpool have been extremely “effective” at ensuring shots do not reach the goalkeeper. As StatsBomb’s Head of Analysis James Yorke pointed out recently, Klopp’s team just do not concede shots on target from the right side of the box.

 

While Virgil van Dijk is a consistent presence at left centre back, on this side the role has rotated between Joe Gomez, Joël Matip and Dejan Lovren. At right back, Trent Alexander-Arnold hasn’t exactly been focused on defending. Jordan Henderson, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and Naby Keïta have spent time as the right-sided central midfielder. It’s hard to point to a reason for this other than it's just one of those things that happens.

On the attacking side? The topline figures aren’t too different, with the Reds beating xG by nearly eight goals. Another small thing to note is that they’ve scored all five of their penalties, which isn’t hugely unlikely but still isn’t the expectation.

Ah, you say. Liverpool have a world-class front three, and thus of course they’d score more than expected!

Well, not so fast. Mohamed Salah, Sadio Mané and Roberto Firmino between them have accumulated 31.64 xG. And from that, they've scored 30 goals. Intuitively, we’d expect these three to be Liverpool’s best finishers, but that’s not happening right now.

So where are Liverpool finishing well? More than half the overperformance in attack can be found in set pieces.

Liverpool certainly seem to pay attention to this phase of the game, and we know it’s something where the masters of it can “trick” the xG models. Having said this, when you watch Liverpool take set pieces, you do not see elaborate, ambitious routines. You generally see a good cross put in for someone to get a good header. It’s a fairly straightforward approach that seems to be paying dividends. There might be repeatability in this, but we really don’t know.

So we’ve looked at various shots, but what about game state?

Liverpool have spent very little time behind this season, so there’s not too much we can draw from here (they’ve performed very close to xG in this period, though). When they are drawing, though, things are a little more interesting. On the attacking side, we can account for all of Liverpool’s xG overperformance when things are level.

Defensively, there’s also a bit of overperformance when drawing, but not a huge amount. Liverpool just finish their chances extremely well when things are level in order to get ahead. Once they get there, they don’t need to finish as well, and they’ve merely been in line with the model.

But what you actually need to do once you’re ahead is not concede. So it would be awfully useful to concede fewer goals than expected when you’re winning, right? Right.

Liverpool score more to get ahead, then concede less once they get there. They're not just beating xG. They’re beating xG at the right moments, in the right ways, to maximise points. Manchester City, by comparison, beat xG in attack, but it’s all come when the side is already ahead. When losing or drawing, they’re a touch below expectation. Liverpool have broken exactly how they’d want to.

Is this “luck”? It’s hard to say with a great deal of confidence that pure chance is what’s driving Liverpool to beat the metrics. But that’s not the most important question going forward. What matters more is whether this is repeatable, and whether Liverpool can put up huge points totals for the remainder of this season, and in the next. This is where it’s harder to make the Reds’ case. Especially when a team overperforms in both attack and defence, it’s difficult to craft a story about how they’re doing it. Liverpool are experiencing a remarkable whirlwind of a season, but a confluence of factors outside their control have come to play a part.

If we were to deflate all these aspects, would we still have a Premier League title-winning side? That’s a more complicated question. It’s fair to say Man City have not had the rub of the green this year, which is also a factor outside Liverpool’s control. But at the same time, City just aren’t as good as they were last season. They’ve seen a 49% increase in xG conceded per game, and the attack has subsequently ticked up by only 8%. Even though City’s xG difference is better than Liverpool’s, it does seem as though the side has managed this by putting up big numbers when already ahead. Perhaps there are other realities where this is a nail-biting title race. Regardless, Liverpool are a really good side while also having had certain things fall their way this year.

Stats of Interest

Everton look like the Amy Klobuchar of the Premier League right now, charging up the table in recent weeks. Their schedule has been very kind, but they've put up some genuine numbers since Carlo Ancelotti’s arrival, especially in attack. With fixtures coming up against five of last season’s top six plus Leicester in the next seven games, this side’s newfound credentials are about to be seriously tested.

Crystal Palace, on the other hand, more closely resemble Joe Biden, with what seemed like a really promising season petering out rapidly as one of the most experienced figures around watches on. It’s worth mentioning they never looked great numbers-wise, benefitting from some hugely positive finishing skews. It happens to the best of us.

Some high profile mistakes from Jordan Pickford have led many to question whether he should start for England in the European Championships this summer. On a pure stats level, it does look like Gareth Southgate should be considering the case for Dean Henderson.

Header image courtesy of the Press Association

The shooting woes of Sheffield United's David McGoldrick, a StatsBomb investigation

One of the most useful things an analyst can do with a statistic like expected goals is find good attacking players who aren’t yet showing up on the score sheet. Players that either take high-quality shots themselves, or create them for their teammates, see those opportunities turn into goals eventually. Then there’s poor David McGoldrick of Sheffield United. Nobody is further behind their expected goal contribution per 90 minutes, defined as combined expected goals and expected goals assisted, than McGoldrick (among players who have played more than 600 minutes). McGoldrick’s futility is even more impressive when you take into account that he has actually assisted more goals than xG predicts. The struggling striker has two assists while he has assisted shots worth 1.26 xG. So, the entirety of McGoldrick’s league-leading struggles at scoring come from shooting. It’s ugly. Couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn with a beachball ugly. Sometimes, when a player is on a cold streak, it’s clear that the culprit is bad luck. Players that take a lot of long-range shots, for example, will often see dramatic swings in their performance against xG, pinging all around their expected level thanks to the nature of the shots they’re taking. A player who feasts on low percentage shots will occasionally see one go in, which boosts his performance against xG dramatically while also going long stretches missing all the hopeful punts he sends in the general direction of opposing keepers. That’s not happening here though. McGoldrick is actually quite savvy when it comes to shot selection. He averages 0.15 xG per shot, which is a fairly robust number. Among players who have taken more than 20 shots this season, he’s 17th in xG per shot. It’s clear from his shot distribution that he’s not piling on low expectation efforts from distance, he’s just getting lots of pretty good shots and missing every. single. one. How exactly is McGoldrick managing to pull off this trick? Well, if we pry apart his shooting numbers we see some interesting stuff (still no goals though). How exactly is he missing? One thing that appears to be happening is that goalkeepers are playing absolutely out of their minds against him. The post-shot xG value of McGoldtrick’s shots is 4.55 from 16 on-target shots. A brief nerdy stats note here. Post-shot xG doesn’t tell us very much that’s meaningful about the quality of McGoldrick’s shooting. A shot that fizzes just wide gets a value of zero and one that’s lollipopped softly into the keeper's arms will have a non-zero value, while the former may very well be a better attempt than the latter. So, the fact that the post-shot xG here is lower than regular xG doesn’t prove much about McGoldrick’s attempts. What it does show is that keepers seem to turn into gigantic multi-armed monsters against him, saving over four more shots than expected. When we get this granular, of course, there is always going to be some debate about who deserves credit for a great save, and who gets blamed for perhaps making the keeper's life easier than the numbers can detect. Those issues get averaged out with large numbers of shots, but when we’re looking at something like McGoldrick prodding a ball in the general direction of a gaping net, and Crystal Palace’s Vincente Guaita recovering to make a save, the question of sorting out exactly who gets credits and demerits for what remains an open one. Individual shots get missed all the time, for all sorts of reasons. It’s just that McGoldrick has missed so darn many of them this season. Four separate times he’s managed to kick the ball towards goal from inside the six-yard box, only to see two of them get saved, and two of them miss the target entirely. The good news for McGoldrick is that he’s almost certainly getting unlucky. Whenever something this unlikely happens, it’s at least partially down to dumb luck. The problem for him is that it’s also probably not just luck. McGoldrick is 32 years old. He’s played his entire career in the lower divisions of English football and never been a consistent goal scorer. While he scored 12 non-penalty goals last season from 15.20 xG (and an additional three penalties), he has not had a prolific goal-scoring career. Before last season he had only reached double digits in goals three times, in 2013–14 with 14 goals for Ipswich Town in the Championship, 2012–13 with 16 goals for Coventry City in League One, and way back in 2008–09 with Southampton in the Championship. All things being equal, we expect players to eventually perform to the xG. But, sometimes everything else is not equal. McGoldrick is a longtime journeyman of a striker. Suddenly at age 32, he finds himself playing at the highest level of his career. He plays for an extraordinarily well-coached team in Sheffield United, one that is exceptional at working together to create great shots. McGoldrick keeps missing those great shots. The simplest explanation is not that McGoldrick is facing exceptionally, historically bad luck (although we shouldn’t rule that possibility out entirely) but rather that he’s a player who just isn’t quite good enough for this level. Sheffield United manager Chris Wilder excels at getting the most out of his squad. That includes finding an aging striker with a preternatural instinct for getting on the end of his team’s highly choreographed creative attacking moves to create really good chances. When you’re Wilder and Sheffield United, however, you’re also shopping in the bargain bin, and that means perhaps the player you’ve found to do that just isn’t quite up to snuff when it comes to actually putting the ball into the back of the net. So, the bad news is that McGoldrick’s finishing struggles might not just be bad luck. The good news is that Sheffield United are succeeding this season anyway. The really good news is that this means there’s room for them to become even better. Just imagine what this team might do if one of their strikers wasn’t chronically unable to finish.