The Tantalizing Talent of Lille's Nicolas Pépé

It's still early. Even with seven or eight games already played in Europe's biggest leagues, the sample size is too small to come to concrete conclusions. A hot or cold streak can still change a club’s underlying numbers and their season projections in a meaningful way. But by this point, trends can develop. And things that have persisted over the duration of the season to date warrant further investigation. It's possible to being to what's likely to continue from what won't. This is especially important when talking about young players who have performed at a higher level from last season and are perhaps in the beginning stages of “making the leap."

It’s common knowledge that Ligue 1 is a good place to scout for young talents. Lots of young players have successfully transferred out of France. The once popular assertion that Ligue 1 is a tinpot league is now laughable (not to mention that there’s been some good non-PSG sides from Ligue 1 over the past few seasons). At this point, Ligue 1 isn’t quite as much of a hidden inefficiency in the transfer market as it was three or four years ago, and perhaps Ligue 2 is increasingly the place to find gems like Tanguy Ndombele at cut-rate prices. Still, France’s top flight league has tons of talent, if you look in the right places.

At 23, Nicolas Pépé isn’t quite as young as some players that have been profiled in the past. A player’s age-23 year is where he’s beginning the transition from a young talent to one that’s in his prime. Pepe was fine last season as a 22 year old, and considering the mess that he had to experience at Lille, producing 16 combined non-penalty goals and assists in those circumstances was a noteworthy accomplishment. Of course, the skepticism comes when you realize that his production was aided by solidly outperforming his expected goals, something that's not likely to be repeatable from year to year.

Pepe is building on the good fortune he had last season though, and becoming the type of all encompassing force that you don’t see too often from players at any age. Shooting over four times per 90 minutes with an xG of 0.4 is impressive enough from anyone at any age, but to do it on a team that is at best the 4th-5th most talented side in France is quite impressive. It’s no surprise that Pepe’s name has been linked with bigger clubs with what he’s shown so far.

Lille have been one of the better stories within European football this season, currently second in Ligue 1 after eight games along with solid underlying numbers that would suggest that they've been one of the three to four best teams in the league. Pepe’s been a huge part of their early success, acting as a focal point of sorts for their attack. Lille attack by trying to pressure the opposition defensive line by creating a series of one against one duels while trying to exploit the space behind defenders. This plays into the hands of someone like Pepe who’s very fast off the ball, and can try to get on the end of long balls.

His off-ball movement might be his best trait as a player. He does a good job combining his speed with an understanding of when to apply his athleticism. Despite being listed as a wide player, Pepe has mostly played in the halfspace on the right side. Sometimes he’ll switch spots with a teammate and retreat back near the halfway line to help with possession, other times he’ll try to maneuver himself into space between the midfield and defensive lines. His movement is also valuable because it can lead to opportunity for others, like in this play. Pepe recognizes that he’s blocking a passing lane for a teammate and creating a straight line, so he moves out of the way which allows the pass to be played and eventually ends up in a scoring chance.

Because of Pepe’s positioning in the right central areas, Lille have their fullback Zeki Çelik sprint up and down the pitch on the right wing to complement Pepe’s inward movements. While this is a common tactic with the growing importance of fullbacks, Celik’s position is aggressive even by modern day standards. He'll often moonlight as a winger during possession. Beyond the understanding of who should occupy which space on the field, there’s a burgeoning relationship with both players using each other to manipulate the defense. When Pepe has the ball while isolated against a defender, he can use the threat of Celik’s runs to create offense for himself.

Along with his off-ball credentials, Pepe can be electric on the ball. He displays the type of burst that would make prospective buyers optimistic that it can translate into different leagues and stiffer competition. He isn’t the type of player that you would necessarily want to try and bring the ball forward from deep positions, but a player who can conjure up moments of brilliance within the final third. At his best, Pepe can pull off solo runs into the penalty box that are just electrifying.

When he’s not trying to take on the entire opposition by himself, there’s subtlety to Pepe’s game. With his proficiency off the ball, he can get himself into open positions and use his coordination to turn and go immediately. He’s also shown the ability to handle the ball in tight areas and lay it off for an incoming teammate to burst into the penalty box for potential cutback opportunities. What might get lost with his high volume shooting or his attempted forays into the penalty box is that he’s a solid passer for what his role demands. He can switch play to the opposite flank, be part of quick hitting actions involving teammates and create chances for others.

That’s the good with Pepe, and on aggregate he’s firmly been a net positive contributor, but there are areas of concern to his game. Perhaps the biggest one is that he’s quite one-footed, and not only when it comes to shooting. Whether he's trying to beat his man off the dribble or even shielding the ball with an opponent behind him, it’s clear that he’s left footed. Being a one-footed player who primarily operates in the half space can still be manageable because there are more angles to work with, but it makes it harder to become a difference maker. Also, Pepe can sometimes get a little ahead of himself and try to go from zero to 100 in three seconds flat and cough up possession in the process.

It's also hard to project what Pepe might look like in a scaled back role, though that's a question that only matters if he makes a move to a club with more establish talent. Lille need Pepe to be a high volume shot taker for their attack to work and the pluses have outweighed the minuses to this point, but it’s meant that his shot locations have leaned towards death by a thousand long range cuts rather than efficiency. Hopefully in a smaller usage role, his shooting would become a bit more efficient, but that doesn’t happen with everyone. It would be interesting if Pepe could find a little bit of a happy medium where he averages 3.25-3.5 shots per 90 mins and nudges his xG/shot over 0.10

For the context of this season alone, while it would be nice to believe that Pepe's impressive start to the season is sustainable, it’s fair to be skeptical that he’ll continue to produce at this level given the massive year over year jump he's taken. Shooting over four times per 90 and not having horrific shot locations is a hard trick to manage. We’ve also seen young players in the past start off gangbusters before slowing down as the sample increases. Malcom’s final season at Bordeaux last year followed that script where his first couple of months were superb and his production afterwards tailed off fairly significantly. On the whole, 2017–18 still ended up being a solid season for Malcom, and one that resulted in a transfer to Barcelona, but there was a dip in performance as the sample size grew larger.

Even if that turns out to be true with Pepe and we see a drop off moving forward, he’s starting off from such a solid base that his season should still end up being a success so long as he doesn’t have a massive fall in form. And there’s the slight chance that what we’ve seen through two months is closer to where Pepe’s true talent level is at. This looks to be the best team he's ever played on, and he’s at the age where players start to put it all together. Pepe's 2018-19 season will be interesting to monitor as the games continue to pile on, as we'll get a better idea at just how real these two months were.

  Header image courtesy of the Press Association

Is Eden Hazard Making the Leap?

Eden Hazard is on fire right now. Despite being eased back into action after the summer’s World Cup, he has six goals, making him the top scorer in the Premier League. The Belgian’s raw talent has never been in doubt, nor has his ability to influence games. There aren’t many better sights in England’s top flight than watching Hazard glide past opponents with the ball at his feet. In the extremely conservative Chelsea sides managed by Jose Mourinho and Antonio Conte, he was often a one man attack, with the side completely reliant on him to progress the ball forward. Cesc Fabregas would offer decent creative passing from deep (when he played, which was not all the time), but the final third was very much Hazard’s terrain to do it all himself. That Chelsea were at all capable in attack last season is a huge credit to him. Still, there remained the feeling that he did not contribute the goals necessary to really place himself among the world’s best. Until now? Hazard has started the season with six goals in 520 minutes, putting him ahead of anyone in England and behind only Neymar, Krzysztof Piatek and Andre Silva in Europe’s top five leagues on the goalscoring front. This represents 40% of Chelsea’s total goals scored, and doesn’t even include his late stunner to win the Carabao Cup tie against Liverpool. But how is Hazard doing this? Is it likely to continue? Is it evidence that he should now be counted alongside the very best in the world? With the help StatsBomb’s data, we can take a closer look at what he’s really doing.  

More of a Goalscorer?

Hazard’s six goals have come from four open play strikes and two penalties. While he certainly has a talent from the spot, the number of penalties Chelsea accrue is, for the most part, out of his control. Considering he has already taken as many as he took in the whole of last season, it seems unlikely that Chelsea will maintain the current rate of winning spot kicks. So that leaves us with four goals, from a shot map that looks like this: Yep, just 1.57 expected goals associated with the shots he’s taken. That’s quite a bit less impressive. The good news for Hazard is, despite what some in the analytics community have claimed in the past but nonetheless fairly intuitively, not all finishers are of equal ability. There hasn’t been a huge amount of research into finishing skill, but what we have suggests that Hazard is better at it than most. Not only is it fairly evident that the Belgian has great technique when striking the ball, but his ability to dribble past opponents and create space for himself might also lead to his chances being a touch better than the model estimates. On the other hand, all of this was also true last season. And indeed, he did beat his expected goals total, but by a more reasonable amount: Last year, he was scoring about 35% more than expected. Had this held true so far this season, he would have scored just two non-penalty goals so far. To draw an even closer comparison, his 0.27 expected goals per 90 minutes this season are identical to last year. It’s really difficult to find any evidence in the numbers that he is going to continue scoring the way he has been recently. And while Hazard may have been driving the goalscoring, this may not continue, as both Alvaro Morata and Olivier Giroud have so far produced more xG than the Belgian. Both have played fewer minutes than Hazard. This is good news for Chelsea, since a dip in Hazard’s finishing could be balanced out with Morata and Giroud finally finding their shooting boots.  

So What Else Does He Do?

If we look at the StatsBomb radar (attacking midfielder/winger template) for Hazard comparing this season to last, it’s obvious that things are pretty similar: The increase in pressure regains is possibly to be expected as he is now playing in more of a high pressing system, but it’s still pleasing to see that he can do it. While it is not shown on this radar, his deep progressions per 90 (passes, dribbles and carries into the opposition final third) have risen from 8.25 to 9.87, but this is also most likely an effect of Maurizio Sarri wanting his side to focus much more on dominating the ball and getting it into advanced positions. Broadly speaking, we are looking at the same player as last season. Hazard is, to put it plainly, really good at football. He was the only player in the Premier League last season to achieve more than 3 dribbles per 90 (of those who played at least 2000 minutes). While another three players (Wilfried Zaha, Rajiv van La Parra and Ruben Loftus-Cheek) amassed over 2.5, none came close to combining the dribbling threat with Hazard’s deep progressions. When it comes to moving the ball into dangerous areas, there is simply no player in England’s top flight like Hazard. That he still manages to advance the ball so much and then add 0.28 xG assisted in open play is absurd. His status as one of the Premier League’s very best players should be in no doubt. Just don’t expect him to be a prolific goalscorer. A curious thing about football is the general belief that the very best players are the ones who should be getting on the end of chances. A player like Mohamed Salah can develop from more of a provider in his Roma days to a consistent goalscorer at Liverpool, and this is widely seen as Salah improving. The period of Wayne Rooney’s career in which he received the most credit was between 2009 and 2012, after the departure of Cristiano Ronaldo but before the signing of Robin van Persie. People thought more highly of him when he was Manchester United’s primary goal threat than predominantly as a creator for others. An almost pure assister like Mesut Ozil receives very little love. Thus, it’s not a shock to see Hazard’s purple patch in front of goal as the moment when he is receiving the most praise of his career. Unless he starts taking significantly more high quality shots, his scoring rate will come back to Earth. It's possible that Sarri may push him to evolve into less of a ball progressor and more of a conventional goalscoring wide player, as he has suggested he wants to, talking of a desire for Hazard to “spend less energy far from goal [and] play in the last 25 metres of the field”. Thus far, though, there has not been evidence of this in the numbers. If he keeps doing the things he has been doing so far this year we will be left with merely the brilliant passing, dribbling and creating talent we know well. And that could still be more than enough to help power Chelsea to a very strong season.     Header image courtesy of the Press Association

Bayern Are Fine, but the Bundesliga May Not Be

The problem with Bayern Munich is that they’re too good. That's why the specific problem is that the team has now gone three games in a row without winning, including a shocking 2-0 defeat away to Hertha Berlin is a problem at all. Those three matches (one in the Champions League and two at home domestically) mean that Bayern, for the time being have dropped out of first place. Cue the crisis debate. Bayern Munich are so good that not winning for three games on the bounce is unthinkable. That’s a problem for the Bundesliga. From a competitive balance standpoint, every league should hope that its best team will struggle for a couple of games on a fairly regular basis. If the best team is so far ahead of everybody else that it only takes two matches of relative mediocrity to cause alarm bells to ring, well that’s a challenge the league needs to address. What it isn’t is a problem with Bayern Munich. Germany’s presumptive champion is still, by miles, the best team in that league, even if they temporarily trail Borussia Dortmund by a point six games into the season. There is not a single area of the game where Bayern don’t dominate. Hiccups happen, even to great teams, and despite the last two games Bayern should still have the Bundesliga sewn up before April arrives. This team is simply too good at everything. Let’s start with the attack. They’ve scored 12 goals. That is, to be fair, less than Dortmund’s 19. Lucien Favre’s club have recently lost their mind and piled up 11 goals in their last two games alone, a 7-0 drubbing of Nurnberg and a 4-2 win at Bayer Leverkusen. That’s a feather in Dortmund’s cap, it’s not exactly something Bayern fans should lose much sleep over though. Bayern’s expected goals numbers are quite good. They average 1.73 expected goals per match. There are a handful of teams averaging slightly more. Teams like RB Leipzig and Hoffenheim are playing extremely open styles, averaging 1.99 and 1.94 respectively while Augsburg and Werder Bremen are right in Bayern’s neighborhood with 1.83 and 1.75. Dortmund, despite all their scoring, and because Favre is a wizard, are only averaging 1.46. If there’s a slight cause for concern it’s that Bayern’s good, but not mind blowing attacking expected goals numbers are accompanied by great shot numbers. Nobody takes more shots per game than Bayern’s 17.67. And Augsburg, with 17.17 are the only team within two shots of the Bavarian giant. Bayern’s xG per shot is in fact fairly mediocre at 0.098. They bury teams in mediocre shots. That generates more than enough attack for this team, but if we’re looking for nits to pick, the fact that they don’t get a lot of golden opportunities is at least a legitimate nit. Part of the reason that they operate more like a blunderbuss than a scalpel in attack, is that it serves their defense incredibly well. While it might be fair to categorize Bayern’s attack as good enough, instead of absolutely great, their defense is truly on another level. They are conceding 0.53 expected goals per match. Wolfsburg, at 0.86, is the only other team in the Bundesliga conceding less than 1.10. In other words, sixteen teams in the Bundesliga concede at least twice as many goals per match as Bayern do. Bayern allow 6.83 shots per match. Borussia Dortmund, at 9.50, is the only other team in the league that allows fewer than 11. The team has conceded three non-penalty goals from 41 shots. That’s the list. Put the very good attack together with that otherworldly defense and the full picture is a Bayern side that’s just a lot better than everybody else, in ways that will almost certainly become apparent over the course of the season. Despite the table at the moment, the underlying numbers aren’t particularly close. There’s not a lot in Bayern’s individual disappointing results that raises alarm bells either. The draw against Augsburg was the result of a late defensive lapse, the kind of thing which might start to draw concern if it happened repeatedly, but given Bayern’s overall numbers seems like a one-off. Occasionally even the best defensive team will trip over their own feet. The Hertha match was even more shocking, and even less concerning. Yes Bayern conceded an early penalty, and then a second from a cross just before halftime. They also piled on the pressure in the second half to an absurd degree, and just couldn’t quite overcome the wounds. Hertha had two goals from six total shots. They managed just two shots after halftime, one in the 94th minute. Bayern meanwhile poured it on, creating three really good chances, and approximately infinite marginal ones. The shot total was 24-6 by the end of the match, and the expected goals were 1.75-1.19. Sometimes stuff happens. Ultimately there’s just no reason to worry about Bayern right. Their numbers are great, clearly the best in the league, their results will follow. In fact, the bigger worry for the Bundesliga is that Bayern might be too good. If the expectation is that Bayern are so good that every game is a must win, that’s a reflection on the current state of the rest of the league. Sometimes stuff happens. A random penalty, a defensive lapse, those are supposed to be normal occurrences. Good teams sometimes lose. If the Bundesliga has become so stratified that Bayern shouldn’t lose, even when everything goes wrong, that’s a sign of an unhealthy league. Bayern are going to be fine. They’re going to go back to winning games and smothering teams, and absolutely strangling the life out of the rest of the Bundesliga. The real question is whether the Bundesliga will be fine as well. If Bayern is so dominant that dropping four points is a crisis, what does that say about everybody else?   Header image courtesy of the Press Association

Arsenal in Trouble: Results are Covering Serious Flaws for the Gunners

On the surface Arsenal waters are calm. While the team left it until late, they ultimately managed to put a couple in the net and defeat Watford 2-0. Usually beating Watford would not be a notable achievement but given that Tottenham weren't able to pull it off, and that the Hornets started the day above Arsenal in the table, and the accomplishment becomes a little more impressive. The win was also Unai Emery’s fifth straight, after two opening defeats. Things seem to be looking up. Look a little deeper, however, and there’s deep cause for concern for the Gunners.

Let’s start by looking under the hood of that comfortable 2-0 win.

Well, that’s not great. The teams were mostly even until Watford took control of the match in the 67th minute with a flurry of activity. Arsenal managed to weather the storm, and then go ahead thanks to an own goal. But, what this clearly shows is that rather than Arsenal dominating the game and then finally pushing one past Watford, this match was a case of Arsenal hanging on, and then getting a fortunate bounce at the right time.

Other than the result, there wasn’t a lot for Arsenal to walk away from this match hanging their hat on. It wasn’t just the expected goal total of 1.95 to 1.34, but more prosaic measures as well. They were out shot 14-9. Arsenal managed just two shots on target to Watford’s five. Arsenal, as expected, dominated possession, completing 468 passes out of 591 attempted to Watford’s 232 out of 345. But those possession numbers are perfectly within acceptable ranges for Watford’s press and counter approach. And given the shot numbers, it’s clear the game was played stylistically in the manner Watford preferred. Even if Arsenal ended up sneaking out a win.

Now, individual games are not dispositive and there are always mitigating factors. Alexandre Lacazette was denied a penalty early on that could have changed the course of the game. If Arsenal was playing from ahead then maybe everything looks different. And it’s only one game, and one at the end of a winning streak at that. Maybe a broader look would mitigate the concerns raised by Watford.

Except that the broader look turns up lots of concerns for this Arsenal side. Arsenal are conceding an eye popping 1.50 expected goals per match. The only five teams with worse defensive numbers than Emery’s team are Brighton, Burnley, Fulham, Huddersfield, and West Ham. That’s bad for any Premier League side, let alone one that expects to challenge for the top four places. Their shot numbers are marginally better. They give up 14.14 per game, which is eight worst in the league. That puts that at 0.11 xG per shot conceded, the fourth worst total in the league. A defense that doesn’t suppress shots, and also allows good shots is not a good defense.

These problems aren’t new, of course. They’re the same problems that Arsenal had coming into the season, and ones that new manager Emery was tasked with fixing. He certainly hasn’t been able to yet. The team seems set on trying to play a highline, squeezing up the field and taking away opponents space.

 

The problem is, just like last season, this defensive approach simply isn’t working. Arsenal’s defensive and midfield personnel aren’t good enough to make the system work. The left side in particular is a major problem. Granit Xhaka is not nearly rangy enough in midfield, and his poor defensive instincts amplify his lack of mobility. Nacho Monreal has aged past the ability where he can comfortably defend in space. The motley crew of Arsenal center backs don't do enough to pick up the slack when faced with that much swiss cheese in front of them. And while Lucas Torreira may yet become a good defensive midfield linchpin, there’s only so much any mortal not named N’Golo Kante can do.

Faced with those defensive deficiencies, Arsenal would need to be an intergalactic level attacking juggernaut for the team to compete at a high level. They aren’t. They’re good, but not good enough given the handicap they’ve been saddled with. They’re averaging 1.41 expected goals per match, which is sixth in the league, just a shade behind Bournemouth for fifth. They don’t actually take a ton of shots, only 13 per match, but they do take efficient ones.

The good news for Arsenal is that despite the problems, they’ve won five in a row and 15 points puts them just about where they need to be, even on points with Tottenham for fourth place. Arsenal’s results have kept them in the mix, but if something doesn’t change, then those results won’t keep coming.

How can Arsenal fix themselves? The obvious answer is by upgrading their personnel at the back, but that can’t happen until January at the earliest, and more realistically next summer. Until then, the team needs to figure out how to change their game to give the back half of the field some help. One obvious possibility is simply dumping Granit Xhaka in favor of a more defensive option. But, it’s unclear if Arsenal have such an option available. Matteo Guendouzi is the obvious choice but at 19, his defending is very active, but not positionally sound. It’s not immediately clear he’d make the defense better.

Another option is playing more conservatively in attack. This is probably the path that can pay the most immediate dividends. When Arsenal attack they are extremely aggressive. Not only are they functionally playing with two strikers now that Pierre Emerick-Aubameyang and Lacazette are both starting, but they are also using the very aggressive movement of Aaron Ramsey and choosing to get both fullbacks involved to provide width. All of that thrust is then conducted by Mesut Ozil.

A slightly more conservative approach, making sure Monreal doesn’t overextend his ability to recover, and playing an actual winger on the left to protect him might help stabilize things. Or, rather than play Ramsey at the 10, play a truer stay at home midfielder, to be part of a central three, adding an extra body to clog the field, and trusting the top notch attacking talent to get it done anyway (and since Ramsey’s contract is running down, preparing for life without him makes even more sense).

Right now, Arsenal’s possession is predicated on scoring. They want to have the ball to use it to score goals. Then, if and when they’re ahead, they are happy to try and defend without the ball. It doesn’t go well. Instead, this team should be looking to be more conservative in possession. Keep the ball, maintain a more conservative shape in possession, use all those passers to kill off games by running teams ragged. Be boring.

The last lingering problem there is that a high dose of defensive possession means having a goalkeeper who can play the ball with his feet. Keeping the ball means when it goes back to the keeper it comes back out again as a pass, not as a 50/50 proposition. This was obviously not Petr Cech’s game. But, Cech went off injured against Watford. It’s now Bernd Leno’s time. He’s supposed to be more proficient with the ball. He better be, Arsenal’s season may depend on it.

Right now, despite the results they’ve managed to pull off, Arsenal simply aren’t working. They need to change what they’re doing if they’re going to make a real run at qualifying for the Champions League this season. They’ve still got time left to make that happen. But each passing week with the same old not good enough defence makes it less likely that the change will ever come. If it doesn’t happen soon, it probably won’t happen at all.

Header image courtesy of the Press Association

Valencia Look to Regain Last Year's Form Ahead of Manchester United Champions League Clash

After a couple of tumultuous campaigns filled with coaching changes and general unrest, Valencia jumped up from 12th to finish fourth in La Liga last season, 12 points clear of Villarreal in fifth, just three off Real Madrid in third, and with an xG difference that was also the fourth-best in the division. While the club did good work in offloading older fringe players and bolstering the squad with some good value permanent and loan deals, the best signing of all was the appointment of Marcelino to their bench. A demanding, detail-obsessed coach with a clearly defined approach, he brought purpose to a team who had previously lacked direction. Marcelino’s teams always seek to maintain a compact shape to control space out of possession and once the ball is won, move forward swiftly and directly to create shooting opportunities before the opposition can get set. “I want us to be organised, with everyone participating equally, regardless of whether we are defending or attacking,” he said in 2015, while in charge of Villarreal. “If we can complete a move in five successive passes along the ground, we won’t do it in 20.” A glance at Valencia’s defensive activity map for last season demonstrates the degree to which their defensive routine was based around quickly regaining their shape and dropping into a deep block. There are some patches of higher pressing but the extreme commitment to applying serious pressure on the edge of their defensive third clearly shines through. It was an approach that worked very well for them. While they allowed 12.84 shots per match, seventh most in La Liga, only Atletico Madrid conceded shots of a lower average xG value than those of 0.08xG/shot given up by Valencia. That added up to the third best defence in the division. Valencia also ranked pretty well going forward, with the fifth-best xG and the fourth-best actual scoring record. If their defensive scheme was based around constricting shot quality then their attacking approach sought to generate good quality opportunities by quickly converting turnovers of possession into efforts on goal. When the ball was won, a wide player would move infield or a striker, usually Rodrigo, would drop off to find space to receive between the lines. While one came for the ball, the others would quickly spread to widen the pitch and create onward options, often criss-crossing as they did so, particularly when Gonzalo Guedes made diagonal movements in from the left flank. The speed with which attacks were constructed and completed is shown by the domination of the team’s shot numbers by the five players most often utilised across the four forward-most positions. Strikers Rodrigo, Santi Mina and the since departed Simone Zaza all enjoyed the most productive seasons of their careers to date, but despite some inconsistency - that he himself admits to - it was Guedes who was perhaps the most important element in the Valencia attack. He was the player who led the team in successful dribbles, who most often moved the ball into the box, who produced the most assists and drew the most fouls. At times he was unplayable, most notably in a 4-0 home win over Sevilla in which he notched two goals and an assist. A scoring contribution of five goals and nine assists, 0.50 per 90 minutes, as a 20-21 year-old in his first season in La Liga was a very solid return. It was no surprise that Valencia paid €40 million to Paris Saint-Germain to make his transfer permanent this summer, even if, as El Pais’ rather snarky headline of “Indebted Valencia secure the signing of Guedes, the most expensive in their history” suggested, there are question marks over how the deal was financed. If Guedes can add more goals to everything he contributed last season - which his increased shot count early into the new campaign suggests is possible - Valencia could have a genuine star on their hands.   The two players tasked with holding things together in the centre of midfield, putting the first concerted pressure on the ball and orchestrating the initial transition from defence to attack were Daniel Parejo and Geoffrey Kondogbia. They formed a mutually enhancing partnership. Parejo put indirect pressure on the ball and helped progress it forward with the subtlety of his passing, leading the team with a league top-10 9.15 deep progressions per 90 minutes; Kondogbia was more directly involved in breaking up play, used the ball well and advanced it on the dribble. He put together an impressive campaign. While Valencia were marginally outshot over the course of the season, they were able to create better chances than they conceded and consequently ended up with a clearly positive xG difference. They weren’t elite at either end of the pitch, but it was a highly encouraging campaign that left plenty of room for growth. Things have not, however, gone to plan so far this season, despite some additions to the squad who seem good fits in terms of attributes (the intelligence and application of Daniel Wass) and output (Michy Batshuayi joined on loan from Chelsea on the back of a goal every 120 minutes at Borussia Dortmund in the second half of last season). Coming into their Champions League group stage match against Manchester United at Old Trafford on Tuesday, Valencia have recorded just one win (alongside five draws and a defeat) in seven in La Liga and are in need of a positive result after losing 2-0 at home to Juventus in their group opener. The statistics suggest that they are still a good side. “If we continue like this, results will come,” said assistant coach Ruben Uria in the wake of the team’s draw with Celta Vigo, and he wasn’t wrong. The attack is still functioning as well as it did last season in terms of creating chances. The problem is that they aren’t being finished anywhere near as efficiently. There has, though, been a slight regression defensively. As was the case last season, Valencia can be stretched horizontally by teams who get good numbers forward across the width of the pitch - a weakness that was particularly evident in the first half of their loss to Juventus. But they have also generally been a bit looser this time around. They are giving up a similar number of shots but better quality ones, in part because their turnovers of possession are more often leading to efforts on goal. They have also been guilty of a catalogue of defensive errors: clumsily conceded penalties, lapses in concentration, failures to track runners and breakdowns in communication. The integration of a few new players is one plausible explanation for this - new right-back Cristiano Piccini has certainly been at fault for at least a couple of goals - while the fitness problems suffered by Kondogbia, their only clearly destructive presence in midfield, has lessened their ability to limit opposition progress towards their back four. With potential top-four contenders Sevilla making a stronger start to the season, Valencia need to find a solution to their defensive issues and start taking their chances if they are to become the first team outside of Barcelona, Real Madrid and Atletico Madrid to achieve consecutive top-four finishes since they themselves did it three times in a row between 2009-2010 and 2011-12. And that same formula could very well yield success against United.