Villarreal’s revitalized attack is the key to their return to form

Villarreal have been one of the most entertaining teams during the early running in La Liga and look to have an attack capable of powering them into European contention. Last season was dominated by relegation concerns but ambitions are much higher this time around. After good work in the transfer market to address problem areas in the squad, Villarreal have made a solid start to the new campaign. Seven matches in, Javi Calleja’s side are eighth in the table, with 11 points from three wins, two draws and two defeats. Their underlying numbers look even better. Villarreal have the second-best expected goal (xG) difference in the league, at 0.59 per match, and have achieved that despite having already faced Real Madrid at home (2-2) and Barcelona away (1-2). It is a better xG difference than they’ve carried through any seven-match stretch over the last couple of seasons. The attack is carrying most of the weight. At a top-line level, they’ve scored 18 goals, the most in the league and their best-ever total at this stage of a season. While that has undoubtedly been boosted by winning and converting three penalties, at a likely unsustainable rate of 0.43 per match (Getafe’s 2017-18 haul of 0.32 per match is by far the best in either of the last two seasons in La Liga), they are otherwise on solid ground. Their league-leading goal tally is matched to league-leading xG numbers. Villarreal Shots 2019-20 RD7 There is a degree of over-performance there, but nothing out of the ordinary given that Villarreal are combining good shot volume (a league-fourth-high 12.86 per match) with very good shot quality (unsurprisingly, Atlético Madrid’s insane early shot quality didn’t hold): La Liga xG/Shot RD7 Villarreal’s shot volume is very similar to last season, but that increased shot quality (from 0.09 xG/shot to 0.12xG) is being achieved by doing a better job of creating situations in which their collection of rapid and incisive forwards can profit. They are playing out shorter from the back than they did last season, pulling opponents out of position as they work the ball neatly forward, and they are also creating a lot of chances in transition: they are second in the league in terms of shots arising from both counter-attacks and high press situations. Gerard Moreno has been the primary beneficiary to date. After a down season last time out in which he scored just eight non-penalty goals, he is making a strong case for a national-team call up with six non-penalty goals and one assist (off a combined 5.35 xG and xG assisted) to date. But the variety of attacking options available to Calleja means that plenty of forwards are chipping in. Karl Toko Ekambi, Moi Gómez and Samuel Chukwueze each have two goals apiece. Summer signing Javi Ontiveros has a goal and an assist. Carlos Bacca is yet to score but has acted as a more fixed central reference point when required. There is plenty of flexibility there. Calleja has switched between 4-4-2, 4-1-4-1, 4-2-3-1 and 4-3-3 formations this season, and has often done so in-game. Moreno and Toko Ekambi (his hilariously bad flipped crosses aside) can do functional jobs from wide starting positions, while Chukwueze and Ontiveros are capable of terrorising tiring defences with their swift and direct dribbling when called from off the bench. In Villarreal’s 5-1 win over Real Betis on Friday, the introduction of Chukwueze changed the game. He won the penalty from which they edged ahead at 2-1, found Moreno on the counter that led to the third goal, scored by Toko Ekambi, and then scored the fifth himself, receiving past a challenge, carrying the ball down the flank and then darting into the area to aim an accurate shot off the inside of the post and in. Samuel Chukwueze Goal vs. Real Betis The forwards are getting a quality supply line from Santi Cazorla. Only Lionel Messi provided more assists than him last season, and the former Arsenal midfielder already has three to his name this time around. At 34, and just three years removed from an injury that seemed likely to end his career, they won’t be able to lean on him too heavily throughout the entire campaign, but he links well over towards the left, consistently makes himself available to receive and has the ability to spot and execute defence-splitting passes. Delicious Cazorla Pass These offensive improvements have been achieved whilst also refining their defensive output. We are still only seven matches in, and much could still change, but Villarreal have so far conceded three less shots per match than last season and have become much better at stopping teams getting off shots in transition and from passes in behind their defence. The result is than their xG conceded per match has dropped from 1.18 last season to 0.91 this. Villarreal Defensive Comparison 1718 1819 Some of that is down to the better balance they now have in midfield, with Cazorla and Vicente Iborra complemented by summer signing André-Frank Zambo Anguissa. Villarreal were seeking a player capable of adding mobility and physicality without being a minus in possession. Getafe’s Mauro Arambarri was also considered, but it was Zambo Anguissa who was brought in on loan from Fulham. His solid performances there were somewhat disguised by the disastrous collective context. When Cameroon’s coaching staff travelled to watch him in person, they didn’t see any signs of individual regression, and he has fitted in well at Villarreal. The 23-year-old covers the necessary ground in midfield and has also shown himself to be able and often skilled dribbler and ball-carrier. Of all players to have seen over 200 minutes for Villarreal so far this season, only defender Pau Torres has carried the ball further on a per-90 basis. Zambo Anguissa Dribble Advance The defensive improvement can also be traced to the centre of the backline. Last season, Álvaro González, Ramiro Funes Mori and Víctor Ruíz ate up the bulk of minutes there. As I said prior to the start of the season, the arrival of the experienced Raúl Albiol immediately raised the competency level, and he has formed a solid partnership with Torres, back from a good loan spell at Málaga and looking very much at home in the top flight. Assured in his defensive work, he also provides the natural balance of a left-footed player on that side of the defence. A native of the town of Villarreal (the fourth to play for the club), on Wednesday he signed a new deal through to 2024. That is not to say that everything is now perfect. Far from it. Villarreal’s defending of set-piece situations continues to be a concern. They’ve already conceded three goals and an above-league-average xG from them. They’ve also clumsily given away three penalties, which is somewhat representative of the occasional sloppiness that seeps into their defending. But if they can pair functional defensive numbers with a highly potent attack, there is no reason they can’t compete for top six or seven finish. With no European football to stretch the squad and removed from the week-to-week worry of a relegation battle, Calleja appears to have found a propitious way forward by focusing on his team’s attacking quality and utilising summer arrivals to sufficiently balance the rest of the side. With a fairly accessible set of fixtures to come until they face Valencia, Atlético Madrid and Sevilla in consecutive matches in December, Villarreal have a good opportunity to establish themselves as a genuine European contender over the next couple of months.

Stats of Interest

Fran Escribá seems to be hanging by a thread at Celta Vigo after somehow producing the league’s lowest shot count and its second worst xG with a squad brimming with creative attacking talent. Quique Setién potentially awaits. Celta Vigo Shots 1920 RD7 After conceding six times in their first four matches in La Liga, Real Madrid tightened up considerably over the next three, including last weekend’s 0-0 draw away at local rivals Atlético. Three clean sheets were matched to just 0.35 xG conceded per match. Real Madrid Shots Against RD5-7 But then they went and gave up all of this in their 2-2 draw at home to Club Brugge in the Champions League on Tuesday. It seems all is not yet well. Real Madrid Shots Against vs. Brugge

AC Milan can't score, Domenico Berardi can, and other early Serie A stories to watch

Remember the old catenaccio cliché? The first four matchdays of the Serie A saw 123 goals in 40 games, the start with the most goals since 1950/51. A total of 24 games ended with at least three goals scored, 14 with at least four. In the five major European leagues, only the Bundesliga has a higher goal per game average (3.24) than Serie A (3.08). The fight for the title seems more open than ever and matches have been full of goals, open till the last minute and really entertaining to watch. But, other than there have been loads of goals, what do the numbers tell us? Four games is a tiny sample in football in which the schedule could introduce a significant bias and it is still too early to judge the many teams that have changed manager during the summer.  Despite their dubious statistical significance, there are already some early trends that deserve to be highlighted and that in some cases are going on since last season. 

Bologna are the best team in the league, but not for long 

Unfortunately for them, in recent times Bologna have regained the spotlight after the announcement of the medical condition of their coach Sinisa Mihajlović. Despite his illness, the Serbian coach decided to keep his job and continue building on the excellent work he did last season. Last season, Mihajlovic replaced Filippo Inzaghi as Bologna coach in January, when they were seriously in trouble. Yet, not only did he managed to get them out of the relegation zone, but he gained an unexpected 10th place finish. The former coach of Sampdoria literally reversed the fate of Bologna as confirmed by the manifest reversal in the team xG trend. Bologna also brought in reinforcements over the summer to look to capitalize on last season's strong finish and in beginning of the season things have continued to get better. Their performance has improved so much that we could easily consider them the best Italian team after four games, even though they collected “just” seven points.  So far just the stellar Guardiola’s Manchester City (3.02) and Borussia Dortmund (2.14) recorded a higher non-penalty expected goals per game average than Bologna (1.92) in the top-5 European Leagues. Yes, read it twice if you don’t believe it. And if set pieces were key in the rise of Bologna's since Mihajlovic's return (they scored nine out of 24 goals this way), this season, while dead balls continue to be important (0.31 xG per game), the Rossoblu are also building a lot of chances in open play. They lead the league in open-play xG (1.61 per game) and xG per shot (0.12). For now, Mihajlovic's team has not even managed to collect as much as it could, since it scored only five goals compared to the 7.75 xG generated. In this regard, it's fair to say that Bologna lacks a reliable finisher. Last season Federico Santander was exceptional at converting headers (3.37 xG, 5 npg) but way below average with every other body part (5.00 xg, 3 npg), and despite an early 27% increase in his shots per 90 average (now at 3.81), his shot quality is too low to suddenly turn him in a 15-goal per season striker. Mattia Destro is not exactly a striker you could rely on for an entire season, although he scored four goals with just 12 shots in 2018/19. Indeed, so far 37-year-old Rodrigo Palacio is the only striker to score at least once. In the long run this could become a serious problem, unless Mihajlovic finds a consistent goal-scoring threat in wide players like Riccardo Orsolini or Nicola Sansone. Moreover, the level of offensive performance of Bologna has certainly been affected by game state and by the fact that on three occasions out of four the Rossoblu found themselves in numerical superiority. They've actually played more than a third of total minutes so far with 11 against 10. Their starting schedule was pretty easy as well. In the first three games they collected four points against newly promoted sides (Hellas Verona and Brescia) and won against SPAL (13th last season). Their first loss came Sunday against Roma, and while it took a 94th minute goal to do it, during the game they fired just five total shots, after averaging 19 in the previous three games. The strength of Bologna's schedule has certainly inflated their numbers in the defensive phase too (third in xG conceded), but Mihajlovic has always built his successes first of all on a solid defense and nothing makes us think that this team is any different. So far, the Rossoblu have shown the ability to dominate lesser opponents, but they also have the weapons to be effective in transition against stronger sides. It is no coincidence that the directness value measured so far for them is the highest in Serie A. As the season progresses and the schedule becomes harder, we could see them settling on a system of play that leads to a less expansive offensive production, but that could still lead them to improve last season's ranking. The outlook for the team seems good and we hope with all our heart that it will be the same for his coach.

Should we trust Domenico Berardi?

Staying in Emilia, we cannot ignore how Domenico Berardi got off to a flying start. In just 279 minutes played he's scored five goals, all from open-play. He's already scored more open-play goals than in 2016/17 and 2017/18 combined. The left-footed inside forward also served an assist that means he was directly involved in 60% of Sassuolo’s 10 goals scored so far (second best attack tied with Roma) even though he missed the first match against Torino due to suspension. Last season, the first under Roberto De Zerbi, Berardi showed some progress with regard to the two previous seasons, but few expected such a start. He seemed to be just another prospect unable to keep his promises. Yet, Berardi was never your average prospect. As a teenager, he scored 31 goals (although 12 from the penalty spot) in his first two Serie A seasons, and he is one of only four players born from 1994 onwards to boast at least 50 goals in the top-5 European leagues along with Kylian Mbappé, Timo Werner and Raheem Sterling. Not bad company. The many penalties scored in the early years of his career have always distorted our perception of his ability as a finisher and perhaps led us to overestimate his ceiling, but so far he has not only been clinical in converting his shots but his-shot selection shot has been excellent, too. His xG/shot has almost doubled up from 0.066 to 0.129. (It's certainly possible that playing four seasons under Eusebio Di Francesco compromised his development on that front) He still tends to shoot too much from outside the box, with the classic movement from the right towards the center of the pitch he does before winding up and unleashing on goal, but for now he leads the league in xG per 90 among players with at least 200 minutes played.  However, Berardi has always been a streaky finisher, capable of extraordinary moments followed by games played like he was an ectoplasm. It is therefore very difficult to predict whether he will be able to continue at this rate. What is sure is that he is unlikely to keep a goal/xG ratio above 250% for much longer, but projecting his average xG onto a season and assuming a year finally free of injuries that allows him to at least play as many minutes as last season, he's on pace to score between 18 and 20 goals this season. That's exactly what he would need to boost his career and finally live to early expectations and become one of the best Italian footballers.

Milan and Juventus are struggling to create chances

Gennaro Gattuso's AC Milan were a team that tried to dominate the ball, but with a risk-adverse style of play, especially in build-up. We could say that in some cases, possession was first of all a defensive weapon. Their defense was pretty good (they conceded 0.94 xG per game), but with 1.16 xG per game (the same amount generated by relegated Empoli) they finished just 5th. Gattuso was fired at the end of the last season and the management chose Sampdoria’s Marco Giampaolo as a replacement, a coach considered capable of proposing a fun and proactive game, consisting of vertical balls and rapid combinations. For similar reasons, after five victorious years, Juventus decided to part ways with Massimiliano Allegri and replace him with Maurizio Sarri, who like Giampaolo, first began to make his expansive style of play known when he was sitting on Empoli’s bench. Despite the plans, both teams are struggling to create opportunities and the transition to a more proactive style of play is taking longer and more effort than expected. Both teams are recording xG numbers well below league average (1.18 xG per game). Milan (0.89 xG per game) are struggling to find the net so much that they have scored just one open-play goal in four games. Somehow, they still managed to gain six points, but after the defeat in the Derby (in which, in all fairness they showed slight improvements, at least in build-up) the situation is getting more and more difficult for Giampaolo who still has to solve a multitude of tactical questions. At the end of last season Juventus showed a worrying downward trend in their xG production. Sarri hasn't managed to reverse it yet and so far, the Bianconeri are averaging around 20% less xG than 2018/19 (1.04 per game). Still, they have managed to limit the damage, scoring nine goals (four against Napoli) and earning 13 points out of 15 available if we include the match against Brescia played last night. All in all, they've scored just six open play goals in five games, considering they benefited from a penalty against Hellas Verona and two own goals against Napoli and Brescia. If they do not improve, the technical quality of the individual players will not be enough to bring home yet another championship. An ambitious project necessarily requires the patience of the management and the fans I am pretty sure both Juventus and AC Milan’s offensive production will improve in the next few games, but their current situation is an excellent example of how complicated it can be to change a tactical paradigm.

Inter Milan’s defensive strength

Thanks to the contribution of Antonio Conte’s tactics and the arrival of Diego Godín, who now forms with Stefan De Vrij and Milan Skriniar one of the most solid defenses of the championship, Inter Milan have so far conceded only one goal.

Not only does Inter lead the league, with 12 points from four games, but they are also the best team per xG conceded, just 0.59 on average. They have been both the team that conceded the least shots (9.75 per game) and the one the conceded the lowest average shot quality (just 0.06 xG/shot). They also tend to defend far away from their goal with an average defensive distance of 48.29. The schedule has not been particularly difficult for now and the team has still room for improvement in attack. It will be the next matches against Lazio (tonight), Sampdoria and Juventus (preceded by the Champions League match against Barcelona) which tell us if Conte's Inter is for real.

New look Sevilla have started strong, will it continue as their schedule gets tougher?

Julen Lopetegui has got off to a good start at Sevilla. Four matches into the season, an unbeaten record of three wins and a draw, five goals scored and just one conceded, has his side atop La Liga despite having played three of their matches away from home.

Sevilla also look on solid ground in terms of expected goals (xG), with a league-third-best xG difference of 0.62 per match. Given the amount of turnover in the squad this summer -- 12 senior players in; 16 members of last season's squad out -- the players seem to have quickly taken on board some of the broader concepts of Lopetegui's approach, and their early points haul provides some breathing room ahead of the tougher run of games that now awaits them.

Over the course of their next eight fixtures, Sevilla will play all of last season's top four, starting with Sunday's match at home to Real Madrid. It is an encounter with special significance for Lopetegui. His decision to join Madrid last summer cost him the chance to lead Spain into the World Cup, and his tenure there was then painfully short. He was sacked at the end of October on the back of four wins, two draws and four defeats. It was a 3-0 loss away to Sevilla that began the five-match winless streak that cost him his job.

Sevilla now represent his shot at redemption, and he has made a cautious and calculated start to life in the Andalusian capital. The style of play has been much less swashbuckling than it was under Pablo Machín and then Joaquín Caparrós last season. Then, Sevilla's matches averaged the fifth-highest number of goals in the division (2.87), the third-highest number of shots (25.42) and the third-highest xG (2.44); so far this season, their matches have averaged the third-lowest number of goals (1.50), the ninth-lowest number of shots (21.75) and the fourth-lowest xG (1.5).

In fact, Sevilla have the league's joint-best defensive record as one of two teams to have conceded just one goal (Athletic Club are the other), and they also currently have its best underlying defensive numbers.

They were already quite aggressive in contesting the ball last season, but one of the first things Lopetegui and his staff started working on this summer was pushing the defensive line up. As this radar comparing last season to this one indicates, Sevilla have so far defended further from their own goal, and in doing so have been able to limit their opponents to just over seven shots per match -- over four and a half less than last season.

 

Sevilla Defensive Comparison

 

There have been spells during these matches in which Sevilla have effectively used possession as a means of control, while Lopetegui has also been quick to make changes to shore up his midfield -- primarily by introducing Nemanja Gudelj -- when it has been clear that control of that zone is being lost.

It all looks promising, but it is probably fair to say that those numbers won't hold. Last season, no one in La Liga conceded less than 0.76 goals or 0.83 xG on a per-match basis. Even if it turns out to be a tighter league this time around -- as the limited numbers to date suggest is possible -- the next couple of months will still likely provide us with a more accurate idea of Sevilla's defensive strength. Schedule can have a big effect this early into the season, and they are yet to face anything approaching an attacking powerhouse. Alavés and Celta Vigo were in the bottom seven in terms of xG last season, Granada are newly promoted, and Espanyol have so far looked much weaker in attack than they were in 2018-19. It is quite possible that Sevilla's high press will continue to be effective in suppressing shots, but you'd expect their average shot quality conceded to increase against better opposition, as is usually the case with sides who utilise such an approach.

If and when those defensive numbers even out a bit, Lopetegui will need to find a way of enlivening an attack that has struggled to create good chances in open play. As this radar comparing this season to last makes clear, the defensive improvement has been matched by a decrease in attacking output.

 

Sevilla Attacking Comparison

 

Sevilla have taken marginally more shots but of much lower quality, leading to an xG figure that's barely hovering above one per match. Lopetegui's side look to have a good balance in midfield, with Fernando holding, Éver Banega orchestrating from a deepish position towards the left, and Joan Jordán in a box-to-box role making off-ball runs into the channels and offering himself centrally once progress has been made out wide. There is tempo and purpose to their ball movement, particularly in transition, aided by the aggression of their two full-backs, especially Sergio Reguilón down the left. The Real Madrid loanee, who will be free to play against his parent club on Sunday, has been full of forward running this season, both in behind following combination play from others, and in terms of carrying the ball himself. On a per-90 basis, he has racked up more carry distance than any of his teammates.

 

Sergio Reguilon Carries

 

Up to that point, Sevilla look good. But all of that neat build-up play has not yet been converted into a steady stream of good-quality chances. Their average shot quality is among the worst in the division, and only two of their five goals to date have come from open play.

The argument could certainly be made that in a primarily possession-based system, understanding and application of the attacking patterns and routines will improve with time, yielding better-quality opportunities. But it does feel as if Sevilla might quite quickly hit a ceiling in terms of talent level.

Over the summer, they lost two key attacking contributors in Pablo Sarabia and Wissam Ben Yedder. Last season, those two collectively scored 30 goals and assisted a further 12 for other teammates. That worked out at a direct contribution to over two-thirds of the team's goals. They were also the players who most often took the high-quality shots. They were responsible for over half of Sevilla's 54 shots rated at 0.30 xG or higher.

 

Sevilla Shot Distribution 18-19

 

Clearly, it isn't entirely possible to separate performance from role, but Ben Yedder, in particular, had a range of attributes that proved extremely valuable in creating high-quality chances. Two-footed, small and nimble, with good movement and instinct, he had the highest average shot quality of any player who averaged over one shot per 90 last season, at 0.21 xG/shot.

His replacement almost couldn't be any more different in build and style. Luuk de Jong, signed from PSV Eindhoven on the back of 94 goals in five seasons, is a lanky striker who requires aerial service. At PSV, and previously at Twente, he showed himself capable of beating up on inexperienced defenders in the Netherlands, but he struggled badly in both of his previous ventures onto foreign shores at Borussia Monchengladbach and Newcastle. At 29, and with limited sell-on value, he was arguably the strangest of Sevilla's off-season purchases, and his performances to date have done little to dispel that notion. He has proved more useful as a reference point in link play than he has inside the penalty area.

That would be acceptable if Sevilla had a bunch of wide forwards capable of creating good opportunities for themselves, but that isn't necessarily the case. Summer signing Lucas Ocampos is an useful reference point in transition, and a very able dribbler and ball carrier into open spaces, but he seems to lack the necessary balance and coordination to get off good shots inside the area. Nolito impressed in pre-season and already has a goal to his credit, but is 32, somewhat injury prone, and four years removed from his last truly productive campaign. You'd be asking Munir El Haddadi or Rony Lopes to do something they'd never previously done on a consistent basis. When Oliver Torres is part of the front three, his role will be that of withdrawn creator rather than shot taker.

Perhaps only Javier Hernández provides the sort of goal-getting instincts inside the area that Sevilla are otherwise lacking, but the initial impression is that he will be a game-changer off the bench rather than a regular starter. When you look at it like that, one starts to wonder if the relatively cautious approach so far this season is simply a practical response to a lack of reliable firepower as much as it is a building block for future expansion.

At this stage, it is difficult to fully gauge the extent to which what we have seen of Lopetegui's Sevilla represents what we are likely to see going forward. The next eight matches will give us a much clearer idea of where they stand in comparison to the other viable contenders for a top-four finish.

Stats Of Interest

Villarreal's Gerard Moreno leads the early running in the race for the Pichichi prize as La Liga's top goalscorer, with five goals from four matches. He has overperformed his xG, but if he keeps getting into these kinds of positions, that might just hold to some extent over the course of the campaign. Even with a five-goal head start, beating three-time reigning champion Lionel Messi to the prize might be a stretch, but Moreno will certainly have the Zarra Trophy, awarded to the top-scoring Spaniard, in his sights. Celta Vigo's Iago Aspas has claimed that award in each of the last three seasons, but he is yet to get off the mark this time around.

 

Gerard Moreno Shots 2019-20

 

Newly promoted Granada have scored three times from set-pieces to date, and have created the most xG from those situations by some margin. It will be interesting to see if they continue to stand out here over a larger sample size.

 

La Liga SP xG 2019-20 R4

 

If you're looking for some entertainment this weekend, may I suggest that you don't tune in to Athletic Club vs. Alavés on Sunday. Matches involving them have averaged both the least goals (1.25 in Athletic's case; 1.00 for Alavés) and least xG (1.14 for Athletic; 1.20 for Alavés) in the league to date.

How worrying is Borussia Dortmund's slow start?

Almost a year ago, a relieved-looking Hans Joachim Watzke was rushing through the Bayer Leverkusen mixed zone. A few Dortmund writers asked the Borussia Dortmund CEO about the remarkable come from behind 4-2 victory. Upset about the perceived media criticism of a difficult start he brushed us off saying, “I’m not talking to you guys after the stuff you wrote earlier." It was a forgotten nugget of a season-defining match. 

On that late September night in the BayArena, Dortmund put up 0.18 expected goals in the first half and were inches away from being 3-0 down, as Kevin Volland’s early second half effort hit the post. Lucien Favre’s decision to bring on Paco Alcacer for Maxi Philipp and Jadon Sancho for Christian Pulisic turned the match around and BVB emerged with a 4-2 victory. The rest with Marco Reus, Paco and Sancho running over the Bundesliga for much of 2018-19 is, as they say, history. 

 

 

History, to continue with the cliches, is written by the winners, and Dortmund’s breakout campaign ended with a spring flameout. The team blew a nine point lead to Bayern Munich, who also threw in a five goal shellacking in April as a knockout punch to secure the title. 

Yet, a Bayern transfer window that can be best described as initially promising (Benjamin Pavard, Lucas Hernandez) turned into a whole lot of emergency plan S (for Leroy Sané) type signings (Ivan Perišić, Philippe Coutinho, Mickaël Cuisance).  Pitted against Dortmund’s perceived incredible window, weakening Bayern by bringing back Mats Hummels on top of adding Nico Schulz, Thorgan Hazard and the aforementioned Brandt, had experts and fans (49% of the 105k people asked by Kicker picked Dortmund vs 37% Bayern) putting BVB ahead of Bayern.

Has Dortmund's spring slump persisted?

It certainly started out well for BVB, outexecuting Bayern in a sloppy SuperCup with only Schulz playing. The Bavarians dropped points at home to Hertha, while Dortmund easily overcame a goal conceded in the first 30 seconds against Augsburg to win 5-1.

Then came the warning signs: the dreaded set piece goal conceded against Bundesliga returnees Cologne, whose intense pressing held Dortmund to 0.2 xg for 53 minutes. That is, until Jhon Cordoba got hurt. The Colombian was tasked with pressing Mats Hummels out of the buildup and succeeded for 55 minutes. That resulted in the artist formerly known as Julian Weigl (yes, that hurt me to write) and Manuel Akanji trying to bypass pressing lines with little success. It was only when Favre introduced and positioned Julian Brandt a good 10-15 yards higher up the pitch alongside Marco Reus in a double 8/10 hybrid role, that Dortmund blew away the hosts. 

 

 

The 4-3-3 with Brandt and Reus as the attacking midfielders was something many of us who follow BVB closely had wanted to see ever since the ex Leverkusen man was announced. Brandt’s exceptional intelligence, the vibrant Sancho combining with Paco and Reus against the tiring Cologne players was a winning formula. That second half pass map heated up faster than the freakishly athletic Achraf Hakimi can sprint down the wings.

Post-match, the narrative shifted from Dortmund’s unresolved issues vs deep-sitting teams to Favre’s subs and settled on “with Brandt, Dortmund can just turn it on whenever they want to." The danger with that flip the switch mentality is that sometimes the switch does nothing. Against Union Berlin, Dortmund played a good first half, but converted just one of a couple of big chances and conceded the “usual” corner goal. Without Axel Witsel and Thorgan Hazard, Favre had two major problems. First, the Swiss coach had to deploy Brandt as an inside-roaming left winger, rather than a central attacking midfielder, which resulted in a whopping 19 failed passes and left Favre with the Mario Götze - Raphael Guerreiro duo “of guys who wanted to leave Dortmund in the summer, but are staying” as creative bench options. Götze remained on the bench in favor of Jacob Backwards-passing Larsen for reasons unknown.

Secondly, sans Witsel, the playmaking was to come from the defensively sound, but methodical Thomas Delaney alongside the metronomic Weigl, which is a pairing that was as uninspiring as it sounds. Thus, Mats Hummels attempted 69 first half passes, 15 into the final third, and succeeded to break several pressing lines on a few key occasions in the first half.

 

 

Delaney, meanwhile, had three final third comps with Weigl chipping in twelve. Things improved when the concussed Delaney was replaced by, Mo Dahoud, who completed 51 of his 53 second half passes including 13 of 15 in the final third. Still, in the second half, Dortmund only created 0.20 expected goals and despite having the vast majority of the ball got out shot nine to six by a team playing its third ever Bundesliga match. Those numbers are alarming, especially because since the great Ashwin Raman breakdown, we know how much Favre uses possession for defensive purposes and it really didn’t work.

“The Union match reminded me of the Rückrunde” said sporting director Michael Zorc, referring to the second half of last season, and that’s a perfect summary of BVB’s old struggles resurfacing: failure to improve and actually getting worse on set pieces, combined with inexplicable defensive lapses and the inability to break down compact teams when Dortmund have to play from behind, stemming from Favre’s overly conservative double pivot. All the reasons why Dortmund squandered away the Bundesliga title last season, with all due respect to Bayern’s excellent turnaround after November.

Favre’s sad set pieces 

Lucien Favre is known for his meticulousness - he’s told Marco Reus that in order to beat a defender more easily he should  watch their feet while he's dribbling, and also was concerned about Abdou Diallo running with clenched fists - but for such a stickler he is strangely indifferent about set pieces. It was the case during his Gladbach days of crushing xG models, though at Nice he had two seasons of conceding only seven and six set piece goals, perhaps the French Riviera even helps with that.

Last season, following the three set piece goals allowed in the Hinrunde, Favre’s Dortmund conceded a whopping ten in the spring, and they've already let in three after three matches in 2019-20. In short, defensively, they have gone from allowing 0.2 xG and being the second best team at defending set pieces to shipping 0.26 xG and 12th place to a ridiculous 0.45 xG conceded - one of the worst marks in the league this young season.

 

 

That’s quite the drop-off and without being inside the club, it’s hard to know why. Per sources, Dortmund supposedly practice set pieces, the responsibilities of co-trainer Manfred Stefes, more than once a week, having stepped up the work after the dismal spring results. It is, of course, possible that this is just a three game fluke, and will naturally correct itself, but on top of the longer term trend, it is, at the very least, worrying.

Just an 11 game mirage? 

The post-game reactions from the Berlin loss were interesting. Aside from the predictable 180 degree turns by the media (preseason favorites BVB “won’t win the title now”) there reemerged, a strange disconnect, one which existed down the stretch last season, between Dortmunds’ management (Watzke) and players (Reus, Delaney)all announcing their title intentions and Favre picking Bayern as the favorites. Platitudes such as talking about needing to stay patient and concentrated and not give away dumb goals are not exactly doing much to calm the situation, though one does not exactly go to a Dortmund much expecting a spectacle at a Favre presser. The questions about whether Favre, a tactics obsessed, detail oriented “grey mouse” who turns mid-table teams into contenders for the Champions League places, has the personality to win the Bundesliga with Dortmund, are perhaps premature and unfair, for in some ways BVB fans will always want another Jürgen Klopp. But at the same time it’s telling that his contract which was to run down in the summer of 2020 was only extended for an additional year late June and given his messy departures at Hertha and Gladbach (where he quit after losing the first five league matches of the 2015-16 season), there should be some worries about his long-term future at Dortmund. In particular, because after 3 games, his Dortmund team looks more like a very good, but not a great team.

This may be a callous way of looking at his ultimately successful tenure - let’s not forget Favre followed the Bosz/Stöger disaster team that almost missed the Champions League - but when you take out the 11 game spike where BVB got 31 points, they are essentially the FOURTH best Bundesliga team over the last 22 games.

After the early difficulties, Bayern were always likely to catch up once Manuel Neuer actually decided that keeping the ball out of the net was a decent idea, though it is still likely that this is merely a great Bundesliga team and perhaps not yet a top contender for the Champions League title. Then there is Bayern’s next opponent, RB Leipzig, a that in a 20 game sample since January have taken 44 points vs. BVB’s 40. Last season under Ralf Rangnick, they essentially came away from the two matches against Dortmund with zero points and would have been right there if Roman Bürki had not saved multiple chances of RB to go up 2-0 in the season opener, while a brilliant but rare Witsel goal decided the return match.

 

 

For now they’ve been perfect under new professor Julian Nagelsmann, who, along with Bayern’s lack of interest, managed to convince Timo Werner that attending the University of Nagelsmann is good for one’s soul as well as their attacking output. Testimonials by Andrej Kramaric, Ishak Belfodil, Sandro Wagner, Ádám Szalai are forthcoming.

Finally, Leverkusen’s trendline shows a clear example of what happens when you install a great manager in Peter Bosz. Seriously, the Boszwagon is opening that graph up like Julian Brandt carved up opponent defenses last spring. Since B04 fired Heiko Herrlich (about 12 weeks too late, but that’s beside the point), their xG looks markedly better than Dortmund's and they’ve also got 41 points to BVB’s 40 in the 20 game Bosz era. The extension talks of Bosz’ expiring deal are justifiably in the works. 

 

It’s only fitting that a year after that amazing 4-2 game and two years after Bosz’s lightning start with BVB, he faces his old team on matchday four. You better believe, he has had that match away to Dortmund circled in his calendar….

Header image courtesy of the Press Association

Juventus, Napoli, Lazio and Roma provide a thrilling start to the 2019-20 Serie A season

Dawn is still breaking over the new Serie A season, but the Italian league has already given a lot of excitement and crackling matches to the fans, who will not be particularly happy with the arrival of the international break. In the first two match days, 68 goals were scored, six more than last season and 11 more than in 2017-18, a figure that had not been reached for almost 70 years. The last edition of Serie A to start with more goals after the first two days was that of 1950-51, when the total amount was 77. In recent seasons, we have seen an increase in offensive production, with increasingly proactive teams leading to higher scoring matches. So, it's no wonder, that out of the 20 games played so far this season, eight have seen at least four goals scored.  The schedule has contributed to making the start of the season even more fascinating, as the second match-day has straight away gifted us Juventus - Napoli and the "Derby della Capitale", Lazio - Roma. Both matches were fought until the last minute that, and, if you have not already done so, I strongly recommend giving them a watch.

Juventus 4-3 Napoli: Same players, new roles

It's still too early to establish if Napoli can finally overcome the reigning champions, but the Turin game gave us our first data point, with Juventus able to beat Ancelotti’s team in a breathtaking match. After taking a three goal lead Juventus collapsed, before Kalidou Koulibaly's own goal in added time of the second half, put the Bianconeri back in the lead, setting the final result at 4-3 and giving Juventus an early 3-point advantage in the table. In a summer of change for Juventus, not much has changed in terms of personnel on the pitch. Maurizio Sarri replaced Massimiliano Allegri at Juventus, but of all the new signings, Matthijs De Ligt was the only one in the starting eleven. Due to the same bout of pneumonia that denied him the chance to lead the team from the bench in the Parma match, the new Bianconeri manager was forced to give up his place to his assistant coach Martusciello. If Sarri was barely visible, hidden by the windows of the skybox of Allianz Stadium, the impact of his principles of play on his team was well evident. In the team's win against Parma their opponents defended low, without contesting Juventus possession, but Napoli began the game immediately trying to cause difficulties to the build-up play of the hosts. In this scenario, Sarri's players' pressing-resistance emerged.  Ancelotti fielded on paper a 4-2-3-1 but during the defensive phase he pushed Fabián Ruiz near Dries Mertens to press the Juventus center-backs, with Piotr Zielinski who in turn pushed higher up the pitch to mark Miralem Pjanić, the holding midfielder of the Bianconeri. Juventus, lined up with a 4-3-3, proved to be a team capable of playing the ball with composure, even attracting Napoli’s pressure on purpose, in an effective attempt to make the play progress. The chart of Juventus pressured passes, dribbles and carries from the first half, shows how the hosts were consistently able to overcome the opposing press in their own half, a feat that allowed them to manipulate Napoli's defensive shape and opening up spaces to attack. Because of Napoli's pressing strategy, which in light of Zielinski advanced position on Pjanić, forced Allan to guard the midfield alone, the involvement of Juve no. 8s Sami Khedira and Blaise Matuidi in relatively wide zones, was one of the keys to the match, especially in the first half. The use of no. 8s was one of the most interesting aspects of the game. Sarri showed that Khedira and Matuidi, two players who seemd to be on the transfer chopping block all summer, can be used in roles functional to his football and completely different to those in which Allegri used them. Khedira, who with Allegri sometimes even acted as an auxiliary striker, was used in lower areas to put his intelligence at the disposal of the team in order to advance the play. Higuaín's goal to make the scoreline 2-0 originated from this type of play, which saw Khedira first drag Allan out of position, then pass the ball to Danilo before receiving it back in the space left vacant by the Brazilian, for what was perhaps the single most important play for the goal, as pictured in the chart below. Matuidi, on the other hand, was employed as a wider weapon, creating 3 chances and above all floating in space to the right of Allan, where he created interesting game dynamics together with Danilo and Cristiano Ronaldo, who were often freed in higher zones by his receptions behind Napoli lines. Below, you can see a chart of all passes received by Matuidi, noticing how most of them are over the midfield line and on the left half of the pitch, the zone Zielinski vacated to press Pjanić. He received 10 passes from Alex Sandro (the most frequent combination for his team), passes which ultimately led to shots with an xG value of 0.57, a team-high for the game. When off-the-ball, Juventus reshaped in a 4-4-2, with the French midfielder playing on the left wing and carrying his and Ronaldo’s defensive load. His involvement in the offensive phase did not prevent him from being the usual hammer in pressing, recording 34 pressures, surpassing all his teammates (Pjanić was second with 20) and four ball recoveries in the opposing half. Other than becoming an instant classic, Juventus - Napoli is the first game that in a way definitively clearly marks the transition from Allegri to Sarri. Against his former team, the Tuscan coach has shown the influence he can have on his players, using two players who were two “fedelissimi” of Allegri in roles completely different from those in which we were used to seeing them play.  Of course, the defensive phase remains to be fixed, since costly individual errors they put the result of the match in question, but he was chosen to reshape the team and it will be appealing to witness further evolutions as the season progresses. On the other hand, Napoli's start to the season is worrying from a defensive point of view. While it's true that they have conceded six non-penalty goals but just 2.29 non-penalty xG, 31 shots against after two games, is far from ideal. There's still plenty of time to improve, but Ancelotti’s side is already three points down in the standings.

Lazio 1-1 Roma 

For football enthusiasts, it was an extraordinary game, the fans were delighted, it was a great show. It was an exciting first Derby, so many strong feelings are difficult to handle. We saw a tribute to football.

If I haven't already convinced you to check out the derby between Lazio and Roma, then let the words of Paulo Fonseca, the new Giallorossi coach do it. In fact, the Derby, despite the result of 1-1, was a particularly enjoyable match, but unfortunately for the Portuguese coach, the credit was mainly due to Simone Inzaghi’s Lazio. In the second part of last season, the Biancocelesti’s manager began experimenting with a new system, which allows him, while maintaining the 3-5-2 as the basic formation, to deploy all his best offensive players. That is now his favored selection, and he deployed it in the Derby as well. Lucas Leiva, who is living a second youth in Italy, was the holding midfielder, Sergej Milinković-Savić and Luis Alberto acted as number 8s and last season’s super-sub Joaquín Correa supported Immobile in the attack. So far so good, since Lazio lead the league in expected goals after two matches (4.10 xG). As you can see from the passing network above, Inzaghi used Senad Lulić and new purchase Manuel Lazzari as wingbacks, keeping them always very high and wide. This served to disorganize the compact 4-4-2 that Fonseca used in the defensive phase, attracting Cengiz Ünder and Justin Kluivert to the wing, freeing space in the danger zone for his four offensive players. This strategy was particularly effective on the left-hand side of Lazio’s attack, where Luis Alberto combined often with Lulić and Correa, while also Milinković-Savić moved to the inside, leaving Lazzari free to act in isolation. Below you can see the Biancocelesti’s passes, dribbles and carries who finished in the opposing last third. Another of Lazio’s offensive weapons were switches of play from one side of the pitch to the other, that helped move Roma's lines horizontally and caused imbalances in their defensive shape. All in all, the Giallorossi seemed far from having assimilated Fonseca’s ideas, who in his first ever “Derby della Capitale” opted for a conservative approach. Roma defended quite deep and decided not to press high, leaving just Dzeko and Zaniolo upfront pressing against Leiva and the three Inzaghi’s center-backs. In attack, they generated just 0.42 xG from ten open-play shots, with just three shots inside Lazio’s box. Even worse, they completed just 2 passes inside their opponents’ box (Lazio completed 14), with one that was a very wide cross and the other a pass to Pastore, who controlled the ball on the left side, with his feet just inside the line of the 18 yards box. Despite all this, Roma were able to take the lead thanks to Aleksander Kolarov's penalty, while Lazio was repeatedly stopped by the woodwork. The final count for Lazio was four woodwork hits, while Roma had two. No Serie A match of the 21st century counted more. Lazio can do no more than complain about not winning such an important match after showing such a clear superiority over their rivals. The Biancocelesti had 22 shots and generated 1.74 xG, including 0.5 xG in the last 27 minutes, in which Roma had no shots. Serie A is only at the beginning and these two teams in particular have accustomed us to considerable swings in their performance during the course of season, but this new offensive setup makes Lazio one of this season's must-watch teams, while Fonseca’s Roma still has many challenges to address.   Header image courtesy of the Press Association

Athletic Club's Basque derby win highlights dramatic strides forward for Gaizka Garitano's side

Athletic Club defeated their local rivals Real Sociedad 2-0 at San Mamés on Friday to record a second home win of the nascent campaign and extend their unbeaten run there to 16 league matches. The fixture provided a worthy comparison between two sides at a similar stage of development. Both Athletic’s Gaizka Garitano and La Real’s Imanol Alguacil stepped up from the B teams of their respective clubs to take over from sacked predecessors in December of last year. Garitano led Athletic from 18th up to eighth in the final standings; Alguacil took La Real from 15th up to ninth. Both expect to compete for European qualification this time around, but at this very early stage of the campaign it is Athletic who seem to have a clearer idea of how to implement their approach. This is how Athletic won the Basque derby, and how it highlighted some of the changes Garitano has made and continues to make to their style of play.

You pass, we’ll press

The stylistic differences between the two teams were readily apparent. Under Alguacil, La Real are a team who look to play out short from the back, combine through midfield and primarily create opportunities from established possession; under Garitano, especially at home, Athletic are a side who seek to suffocate their opponents early on with a high press and a quick and direct attacks down the flanks and into the channels. It is an approach that feeds on what Garitano perceives to be the physical superiority of the Basques: “It’s what predominates in our footballers. It’s in our DNA,” he said. “The crowd at San Mamés enjoy themselves because it is an infectious style of play.” Those differences set up an interesting dynamic, and one that proved to be to Athletic’s favour. “I think any team like us who tries to play out from the back has to do it very well against Athletic,” Alguacil said afterwards. “But we were unable to, and they were phenomenal. During the week, we practiced a number of routes forward, but we were unable to execute them. They are worthy winners. In the first half, they were better in every aspect.” It wasn’t just that Athletic scored twice inside the opening 30 minutes to establish a lead they never looked like relinquishing; the degree to which they completely disarmed their opponents that was perhaps even more impressive. La Real only successfully entered the final third, off of a pass, dribble or carry, 10 times during that first half. They had done so 26 times against Mallorca the week previous, and 27 times against Valencia on the opening weekend. They didn’t attempt a single shot. Look at this map of their first half carries, dribbles and passes (red lines are successful actions; yellow lines are failed actions) and you’ll notice a gaping hole in the centre of the final third. Real Sociedad's first half passes Athletic had successfully forced Barcelona to go wide to find a way forward in their league opener at San Mamés, and so it wasn’t particularly surprising that La Real likewise struggled to pick a way through. They seemed to lack reliable reference points to hold the ball and allow them to move upfield. Despite Martin Odegaard’s relentless prodding and probing (he ended the match having touched the ball more times than anyone but defender Igor Zubeldía), they were unable to successfully work the ball forward. Athletic are clearly doing something right. They’ve defeated Atlético Madrid, Barcelona and Real Madrid on home soil since Garitano took over. He has said that he wants his side to be able to control all phases of the game, and that is what they’ve been able to do in both of their home matches to date, mixing that early high pressing with spells of deeper defending thereafter. It took La Real until the 83rd minute to get off their first of just two shots. To have only conceded 0.57 expected goals (xG) per match across home wins over Barcelona and Real Sociedad and an away draw with Getafe (1-1) represents a strong start, and continues the clear defensive improvement under Garitano. He inherited a side with relegation-worthy defensive numbers under Eduardo Berizzo and immediately got them on more solid footing. Athletic xG chart 2018-19 In fact, they were the league’s best defensive team (in xG terms; third-best in terms of goals conceded) from his appointment until the end of the campaign. La Liga xGC 0412 to 2005

Athletic’s attack: Quick thinking and set pieces

Athletic can be expected to lean heavily on their defence this season because in terms of both personnel and approach they are never going to be a super-expansive attacking force. In the admittedly limited sample size to date, no team has created less open-play xG (0.34 per match) than they have. This is not a team who can regularly be expected to create chances from orchestrated sequences of possession; instead, their attack is built around the exploitation of unconnected instances. Three of the team’s four goals to date have come within five or less touches from a throw-in in the attacking half. Two of them have come directly from crosses arising from layoffs straight back to the advancing throw-in taker, including the first goal against Real Sociedad. Ander Capa throws the ball into play and immediately sprints in behind the confused full-back onto Iker Muniain’s return to cross low for Iñaki Williams to sweep home. Athletic Quick Throw-In Goal “Through one-twos and combinations one can generate situations that lead to good crosses and goals,” Garitano explained when questioned about it afterwards. Surprisingly given their personnel and historic reputation, Athletic were actually La Liga’s worst team in terms of scoring and creating chances from set-piece situations last season. That was a focus for Garitano in pre-season -- a point of identity he wanted to recover. In addition to their rapid throw-ins, they worked a couple of corner schemes that caused problems for Real Sociedad’s somewhat passive defensive setup. We’ll have to wait and see if there is a maintained uptick in productivity from these situations as the season unfolds.

Focus on the fullbacks

Last season, Athletic primarily built into the final third through their midfielders, with Muniain and Beñat leading the team in deep progressions. But so far this season, it has been the two fullbacks who have led the way. The sample size is so small right now that it is difficult to know to what degree that will hold, but certainly in their matches to date, Capa and Yuri Berchiche have had prominent roles in moving the team forward. One columnist described them as a pair of “steam hammers” after the derby win, and Garitano also handed out plenty of praise to two players he previously worked with during his time at Eibar. Capa, in particular, is just an intensely positive fullback, constantly seeking to combine or drive into space. He already has three assists to his credit, and here are his final third entries to date. Look at the distance on some of those carries (the dotted lines). Ander Capa F3 Entries 2019-20 If the full-backs do continue to shoulder the primary responsibility for moving the team into the final third, Athletic would join a select group. Only two teams in La Liga have had their two full-backs at the top of their deep progression rankings in either of the last two seasons: Eibar and Getafe. Will Athletic become the third?

Unai López

At a club whose scope for reinforcements is limited by their Basque-only policy, there can often be space for players who had previously been on the fringes to find a spot in the starting XI as others move on or regulars begin to succumb to the effects of ageing. This season, it looks like that will be the case for Unai López. After a couple of years out on loan and limited minutes back at Athletic last season, the 23-year-old has started in midfield alongside Dani García (another whom Garitano previously coached at Eibar) in both of the club’s home matches. In those limited minutes last season, López showed signs of being an able ball progressor. Unai López Radar 2018-19 Whether that will prove to be such a valuable skill if the ball progression emphasis falls to the fullbacks this season is clearly a point to consider, but López also provides a bit more mobility than Beñat (the regular starter alongside García under Garitano last season) typically does in possession, dribbling more often and carrying the ball further. This is a good example from the derby. López picks the ball up just past the half way line, drives into space down the left and then neatly flicks the ball inside to Williams. Unai López Carry and Pass He also provided an example of his passing range with an expertly weighted diagonal switch out to Iñigo Cordoba in the build up to the second goal, scored with a nice chipped finish by Raúl Garcia -- the battering ram with the subtle touch. Unai López Diagonal Switch There is also a feeling that the way López delivers set-pieces opens up a wider variety of routines from those situations than Beñat’s technique. There will certainly be matches, especially away from home, in which Garitano is likely to prefer the experience of Beñat or the physicality of Mikel San José (both of whom are out of contract next summer), but early displays suggest López could have an important role to play this season.

Anatomy Of A First Half: Liverpool v Arsenal

Games between top six sides do not tend to look like this:

That's just the first half, but the whole of Liverpool against Arsenal very much looked the same. A remarkable congruence of tactics and the new goal kick rule that meant that Arsenal played really, really deep and essentially invited Liverpool to play ahead of their box, which in the main they did. Seriously, even Jose Mourinho back in late 2017 parking the bus at Anfield while shopping for a 0-0 and getting one looked very different, this Arsenal set-up was something else entirely: Was it fear? Last December, Liverpool hosted Arsenal and Unai Emery was chastened by a 5-1 drubbing that was 4-1 at the half with a pass network that looked like this: Just too open? Interestingly, only five players started both fixtures for Arsenal, which feels representative of the player flux that we've seen at the club. What really piqued my interest about last weekend's game was the half time shot count. Arsenal conceded 15 shots while taking five of their own in a half that as we've seen was played predominantly in one part of the pitch. Now the expected goal values of all these shots were closer together, Liverpool's 15 shots rated a mere 0.83 while Arsenal's measured at 0.6. So through one lens--expected goals, this was a close half. By other lenses, it wasn't. Many, many first halves of football finish with the two sides within a quarter of a goal in xG, just as in this game. Last season there were 122 in the Premier League alone. Of those 122 games, the maximum shot differential at the half was eight. So already here we have an outlier game: very close xG but not remotely close shot counts are scarce. How often did a team ship 15 shots in a first half last season? It's well known that shot rates tend to increase as matches progress, so even when you see a 30-plus shot beatdown, most of the time, the shots get racked up in the second half. And that's true here. Only four times in 2018-19 did a team reach the half time point having allowed 15 or more shots. Three of those matches were small teams flailing around against Manchester City and the other, oddly, was Newcastle versus Huddersfield. All this brings to the boil a personal frustration of mine. Expected goals is a useful tool in many aspects of analysis, but it's not the only one. What actually happened in this half of football over and above the modelled value of the chances? To allow 15 shots of any kind in a half is a clear sign that a defensive plan isn't working.  Take Liverpool's left flank, expertly patrolled by Andrew Robertson and Sadio Mané with Georginio Wijnaldum shuttling across. It was very easy for these guys to progress, here are Robertson's first half ball carries and passes:

red=complete, yellow=incomplete

Long carries down the flank, deep into Arsenal territory, which on another day may have caused greater pain. Four times in that half, Robertson put balls into the box that went straight through. Twice, David Luiz judged to let the ball through with players lurking behind him. Mané misplaced two open play passes in the half, Wijnaldum just one. This flank was just open and easy to travel through. If we evaluate the half we can see a theme of space and time. Here are my notes: 2nd min: Robertson advances, fizzes the ball across goal, Firmino behind Luiz stretches but can't get there 3rd min: Set piece, through the box, Luiz lets it go again 8th min: Alexander-Arnold open cross to nothing nb. Three times in opening 8 minutes Matip is making passes on edge of final third, Arsenal super deep 11th min: Adrian error, Aubameyang over 13th min: Mané gets in round the back to nothing 15th min: Robertson advances, 3 seconds nobody comes to him, cross/shot 16th min: Robertson to an open Mané on halfway line, Mané carries to edge of box unchallenged 20th min: Robertson cross, straight through 21st min: suicidal clearance, good chance for Mané, saved 22nd min: Salah shot from 30 yards, no pressure on him, blocked 22nd min: Robertson low cross, straight through 23rd min: Firmino, skill, space in box, shot blocked 24th min: Mané open but wide, skies it nb. Arsenal when trying to attack spread right across the pitch, no linkage 30th min: Pépé bends one from range 33rd min: Henderson error, Pépé misses highest value chance of the half At this point it's seven shots to five, and perhaps Arsenal feel good, but time and again, Liverpool have found space in good positions, they just haven't done anything really useful with it or contrived to convert. Then the last ten minutes of the half are a complete disaster for Arsenal. In the 36th minute, Liverpool cross the half-way line in possession. A shade under five minutes later, they score. In the interim, Arsenal do not touch the ball outside their own half. These are their open play passes during that phase:

red=complete, yellow=incomplete

That's four completed passes and two failed in five minutes of play. Liverpool found a way to enact extended pressure and finally were rewarded for it. Every time play restarted, they were faster to the ball, and quicker to react, as you can see in the notes: 36th min: Liverpool complete 5/6 passes, Alexander-Arnold overhit cross. 37th min: Arsenal win consecutive throws then give away ball with aimless punt to halfway, Liverpool complete 4/5 passes, keeper claims Robertson cross, Liverpool quickly win cheap turnover and are fouled on edge of final third, centrally. 38th min: Robertson high free kick cleared by Luiz, Liverpool win corner, Van Dijk header, blocked, Alexander-Arnold speculative volley, blocked out for a throw. 39th min: Salah snap-shot from throw in. 40th min: Arsenal try to play out, fail, Liverpool win ball back comfortably, Firmino makes space outside box, shoots, blocked, recycle possession, Alexander-Arnold picks up ball, crosses, blocked out for a corner. 41st min: Alexander-Arnold corner, met by Matip (Van Dijk being fouled), goal, 1-0 At this point, Liverpool have added five more shots, and they were to add three more in the remaining minutes of the half, while Luiz also cut out a Firmino throughball and Salah found the return pass from a one-two with Mané nipped off his toe. Without ever having to really exert themselves extensively, Liverpool turned the screw and finished the half extremely strongly. The next shot they would take would be the penalty to make it 2-0 and effectively seal the game. We can see Liverpool pressed high up the pitch during that first half--they could hardly do anything else--and Arsenal very much allowed them to: They let Liverpool push onto their full-backs and this made outlet balls difficult to complete. The point here is that the outcome of this half was inevitable when factored against the tactics Arsenal deployed. It's easy to grasp the Pépé chance and feel it was potentially decisive, but it's only a one in three opportunity, and he's not even in the box. A style of play that struggles to even gain possession outside its own half is fairly doomed to failure. We saw the same the week before during Manchester City versus Tottenham. Here's Tottenham's pass map for minutes 30 to 50:

red=complete, yellow=incomplete

Does it matter? Well yes, Tottenham allowed nine shots with an expected goal value of 0.83 during this period, and Sergio Agüero scored. Nobody is suggesting that matches away at Manchester City or Liverpool are easy to approach but these Tottenham and Arsenal performances certainly land on the leaner side both stylistically and via fundamental metrics. By attempting to outflank the best counter-pressing teams in the league with neat play around your own box, you're almost certainly inviting trouble. And I think this is what frustrates me in particular about Arsenal's approach. Liverpool had shown a potential defensive weakness in their first two games in the Premier League this season. Norwich scored and hit six shots on target from 13 with 1.1 xG, while Southampton also scored and landed 1.6 xG from their 11 shots. Unai Emery's gameplan felt like one which respected the Liverpool team of last season, the team that was firing on all cylinders when demolishing his team 5-1, not the team that hadn't quite clicked into gear in 2019-20. They afforded Liverpool too much respect while negating their own strength--their attacking prowess--and ended up on the wrong end of a one sided match regardless. Emery has been accused of being timid before, especially in away games. It's an obvious area to work on for the future. These points may well have been dropped regardless, but in the long term, any ambition towards progress and success will dictate that his team is more competitive when traveling to high quality opponents.

Barcelona’s Griezmann Signing Makes No Damn Sense

Listen, Antoine, it’s not you. You’re great. You won a World Cup, you helped keep Atlético Madrid in the European elite for years, and you once placed third in Ballon d’Or voting, which given the competition was basically like winning the Humans Only division. But observers of FC Barcelona know better than most that sometimes a great forward can be a bad signing, and that’s why for all your accolades, for all the hoopla around a transfer saga that lasted for two excruciating years plus however long your LeBron knockoff La Decisión video dragged on, haters keep pointing out the obvious: nothing about Griezmann to Barcelona makes sense.

Like all things Barça these days, this is really about Lionel Messi.

For the last few years, Barcelona has had—whisper it softly—a little bit of a Messi problem. It’s not that he’s stopped being the greatest player of all time; if anything his impossible goal production rate last season suggests he’s only getting stronger in his thirties, like Serena Williams or hangovers. The issue is how the team shapes itself around his greatness.

Ever since Luis Suárez’s arrival bumped him out to the right wing, Messi’s been creeping back inside behind his striker, throwing the 4-3-3 off balance. In 2015/16 he attempted 27% of his open play passes in the attacking half from the right wing and 24% from the central fifth of the pitch; by 2018/19 that had flipped to 22% from the wing and 27% in the middle. Instead of receiving on the touchline and dribbling inside to release the ball, Ernesto Valverde-era Messi plays pretty much permanent hookie in the right halfspace, width be damned.

Messi’s drift has had knock-on effects across the squad, as Valverde has looked for ways to spread his attack by rotating workhorse midfielders like Paulinho and Arturo Vidal to the front line or stretching Sergi Roberto to his breaking point up and down the right flank. It’s also changed the way the other forwards operate. Suárez plays a little farther left than he used to, sometimes slipping outside the centre backs to open a channel for Messi.

When Ousmane Dembélé starts, the two-footed winger is as likely to line up outside Messi to the right as he is on the left wing, where an overlapping Jordi Alba is Messi’s preferred target. As for Philippe Coutinho, he’s suffered carrying the ball into Barça’s clogged middle without the skill to combine in tight spaces. It’s hard out there for all these €120+ million attackers just trying to fit in.

Speaking of! You know who else really likes that right half-space where Messi hangs out? That’d be one golden-curled, fuzzy-lipped Antoine Griezmann, whose pass sonars show a taste for exactly the kind of left-footed diagonal pass into the box that’s been Messi’s bread and butter for the last five years or so.

In the viz below, shard length represents open play pass count and lighter colours mean a longer average pass length. Red = a completed pass on the second viz. If Griez were to play for Barcelona the way he did for Atleti last season, he and Messi would literally step on one another’s toes while looking to curl the same balls to Alba or Suárez at the far post.

That’s not the only way Griezmann’s skillset is redundant for his new club. Of his 15 goals for Atlético Madrid last season, three came from direct free kicks, three from penalties, and only seven were scored from open play, slightly underperforming his 8.46 open play xG.

Considering they’re about as likely to erect a monument to Luis Figo at the Camp Nou as to take Messi off free kicks or—for better or worse—penalties, Griezmann’s scoring comes with a cap. Sure, Atleti's attack was mediocre last year and sure, playing alongside Messi tends to boost teammates’ numbers, but you’ve got to muster quite a bit more than seven goals to live up to a €120 million price tag.

Griezmann’s release clause isn’t his fault, but by paying it Josep Bartomeu and co. put themselves in the precarious position of shelling out the most ever paid for a player over 25 years old on a guy who’ll turn 29 this season.

That’s a problem for one of the most popular defences of the Griezmann signing, that we should think of him more as an understudy than a complement to Messi. Given Messi’s greater versatility and fairly light injury history, there’s no guarantee Griez—whose game depends more heavily on athleticism—will outlast him. Even if he does, he’d be a different type of forward, less comfortable in possession and less, you know, just preposterously good at everything.

Again, caveats about Diego Simeone’s defence-first style apply, but this is not the profile of a guy who’s going to orchestrate your whole attack. Griezmann last year took and created quality chances at a rate somewhere below your average La Liga attacking midfielder.

He didn’t shoot much from dangerous positions, barely took on defenders, and whatever pressing work he put in didn’t do much to help Atlético Madrid’s vaunted defensive structure recover the ball. After years at a club where a pass completion rate in the mid seventies was no issue, the case that Griezmann’s just going to waltz into Barcelona and play like some long lost La Masia product remains highly speculative.

Under both Simeone in Madrid and Didier Deschamps for France, Griez has excelled in free-flowing, quick-strike attacks that may be Barça’s future but are far from its current ideal. Take a second to scan the longest half dozen Atleti possessions that ended in a Griezmann shot last season—you’ve got what, maybe one or two that looks anything like Barcelona’s patterned attack?

The hope, of course, is that Griezmann will adapt to the players around him, and he’s talented enough that you wouldn’t want to bet against him. But the last decade of big money Barcelona signings shows how hard it is to predict who’ll mesh with Messi—or maybe how little attention the board has paid to on-field needs while chasing transfer hype. Griezmann could be the next David Villa and rediscover himself on the wing (where he got his start with Real Sociedad), or he could be the next Coutinho, a star signing that looks good on paper but makes you want to hurl heavy objects through your TV during the Champions League knockouts.

The fact that Griezmann will never occupy centre backs like Suárez or beat defenders and lay in crosses like Dembélé makes it hard to figure how he fits into Barcelona’s best eleven at the start of this season, but the sheer gravitational pull of the signing pretty much obligates Valverde to figure it out. Will we see a return to the false nine with Dembélé-Messi-Griezmann? A narrow Griez-Suárez-Messi trio with fullbacks providing width? Maybe a top-heavy 4-2-3-1 with Messi at the ten and Frenkie de Jong pulling the strings from a double pivot? Oh and by the way what the hell happens to Griezmann if this whole Neymar thing actually goes through? Literally no one knows! And the La Liga season is already underway! This should be, for the club that just spent a whole armoured convoy of cash on a player with no obvious position, perhaps a source of mild concern!

If anything’s getting culés through these uncertain times, it’s YouTube highlights of preseason games in which Griezmann has looked very much like the player the club hoped it was buying. With Suárez back in the lineup, Griez has started on the left wing and sparked a couple of nice goals in the last Napoli friendly with wandering moves that took him all the way to the other side of Suárez, into his favorite right channel.

But he also lined up on the left for the first half an hour or so in Barça’s first league match of the season, a 0-1 loss at Athletic in which their only chance of note was an opposing player literally passing the ball to Luis Suárez. After Suárez went down Griezmann moved up front and they created little else. The team will fare better when Messi returns, of course, but it might be at the expense of poor Antoine.

Can Bayer Leverkusen build on last season’s second half success?

The most appropriate way of analyzing the 2018–19 season for Bayer Leverkusen is to break it into two halves: what occurred before and after the hiring of Peter Bosz.

The first half of the season under Heiko Herrlich was nothing more than a disappointment, placing ninth with agoal differential of -3. Given the high end attacking talent that existed on the squad with the likes of Leon Bailey, Kai Havertz, and Kevin Volland, only ranking middle of the pack in goals scored was not what many had expected, especially since the 2017-18 season was a rather positive one.

What came after, with Peter Bosz’s appointment, was dramatically different with both results and overall playing style moving in a more positive direction. Leverkusen went from a mediocre side to one that arguably played like the 2nd best team in the Bundesliga, an amazing jump in performance given the mid-season managerial change. For Bosz, the success he had last season helped wash away the bitter taste from his failed stint as Dortmund manager in 2017–18. The most important accomplishment for Leverkusen was that all the success they had in 2019 helped them sneak into the top 4 by season’s end and qualify for the Champions League, something that’s crucial to the club on a number of fronts.

With the majority of their squad returning, along with some interesting additions via the transfer market, Bayer Leverkusen look to once again possess a squad that should be one of the better sides in the Bundesliga.

Metrics

It’s very hard to come up with a narrative other than Leverkusen being roughly average during the first half of the season, which is a major reason why Herrlich lost his job. Their middling goal differential is one sign of Leverkusen's uninspiring performance, but peak behind the curtains and you’ll see further illustration of that. They were only around even in shot differential, with slightly better than average shots for and worse than average shots against, and things didn't get particularly better when accounting for shot quality via expected goals as it showed a similar pattern.

The fact that Leverkusen's attack was slightly better than their defense made sense given the high level of attacking talent in the fold, but in the grand scheme of things, that didn't matter because the end result was a mediocre side and that's not good enough for a club that's been a relative mainstay in the Champions League over the past seven seasons. The switch to Bosz mid-season saw Leverkusen's performance shoot up substantially. They controlled just over 57% of shot attempts, a solid share of shots and something you would come to expect from a CL level side. Expected goals tells an even stronger story, with Leverkusen having an expected goal difference per game of 0.99 that only Bayern Munich bested during the second half of the season. Another major difference between Herrlich and Bosz was the level of aggressiveness in winning the ball back. During the first half of the season, Leverkusen under Herrlich were one of the more passive teams in the Bundesliga both in how high up they won the ball and unremarkable in how many passes they allowed the opponent to have before committing a defensive action. While it wasn't surprising to see that change under Bosz given how Ajax and Dortmund played under his watch, it still remains striking to see how much more aggressive Leverkusen became in hunting the ball back and not giving the opposition time to build from the back. Put it all together, and what you have here is the type of uptick in performance in-season that is quite rare to see. It's not out of the ordinary to see a team start slow through the first half of the season and have better metrics as the season goes along, but it’s something entirely different to jump from having the true talent level of a mid-table outfit to becoming a top two or three side. Of course seeing that it's the Bundesliga, you're still dealing with the juggernaut known as Bayern Munich who were ridiculously dominant even during a down year, but it shouldn't go unnoticed just how impressive Bayer Leverkusen were in 2019.

The Bosz Effect

Given how hard it can be for managers to implement a coherent play style mid-season, especially when trying to play more proactive than reactive football, it was impressive just how much Leverkusen were able to adapt to his methods and reach some of the peaks they did. For sure, they had their stumbles in the second half of the season, but the process was by and large a major success. Given how Leverkusen build out of the back, there was a clear plan for how they were going to progress play. Often times, Wendell would tuck in from the left as a third center back with the double pivot not too far ahead of them. While this was going on, there would be an emphasis on maintaining proper spacing in terms of width and not having too many players situated in one area. When the advanced central midfielders would drop back, it would help create overloads that would allow for one touch combinations, a staple of Leverkusen's attack.

For how much Leverkusen dominated possession, they were extremely good at being able to either create counter attacking shots, and win the ball back high up the pitch, turning those moments into dangerous attacks. Under Bosz, Leverkusen ranked 2nd in counter attacking shots and 1st in shots from possessions that were won within 5 seconds of a defensive action in the opposition half. They were also strong in winning second balls and immediately transitioning the ball forward. Given the amount of compactness in how they were situated to regain possession, along with the cumulative passing talent on the squad, it made sense that they would be one of the better teams at turning defense into attack.

Perhaps the biggest things that Bosz did was turn Julian Brandt and Kai Havertz into players who spent a lot of their minutes operating as free roaming number 8’s (Havertz did eventually migrate into more of a right sided attacker towards the end of the season). They were given license to drop back to help with buildup, make runs deep into the opposition area + penalty box, and dictate play when needed through quick combinations. They developed a good sense for knowing when one would roam high up the pitch with the other dropping back to cover. Brandt’s ability to carry the ball in central areas had greater impact than when he was operating in the wide areas, seeing as his passing options out wide were considerably more restricted. Playing as an 8, he was able to utilize his ball carrying abilities as part of Leverkusen’s transition from patient buildup into controlled chaos. As good as his exploits on the ball were, Brandt could also be just as delightful working without it. His interpretation of space and knowing where to be to maintain proper spacing, and not eliminating passing options for others was strong. While Brandt was an intriguing player during his days as a full time winger, he arguably hit a new level of performance during the second half of 2018–19.

Bosz's appointment also did wonders for Leon Bailey, who was much better in 2019 vs 2018. I've long been a big fan of Bailey, particularly because he's the rare young winger who combines functional athleticism at an elite level with strong on-ball skills. Among Bayer Leverkusen players who played at least 900 league minutes, Bailey ranked 4th in open play xG assisted, 3rd in open play chances created, and 4th in open play passes into the box. In addition, he's also a credible crosser as he ranked 2nd on Leverkusen in completed crosses with 1.96 per 90 minutes at a 40% completion rate. The bar to being a valuable player for a winger playing on his natural side is probably higher versus functioning as an inverted winger, but Bailey has the all-around skillset needed to succeed at a star level.

Transfers

Bayer Leverkusen’s business to this point has been rather efficient, as it tends to be for Bundesliga clubs. The departure of Julian Brandt was significant given the value he provided last season, along with him amazingly still being only 23 years old despite having logged regular minutes since the 2014–15 season, so there might’ve been the chance of him still getting better with another season under Bosz. It also didn’t help that he was snatched up by Borussia Dortmund, a club that Leverkusen will be competing with for Champions League positioning for this upcoming season.

It’s hard to pick holes with what Leverkusen did. In having to make up for the departed Brandt, they were part of the pillaging of Hoffenheim and got both Kerem Demirbay and Nadiem Amiri, talented midfielders in their own right for just under £40m combined. Given Daley Sinkgraven's injury history, they didn't have to pay much to get him from Ajax and he should function as squad depth. What will dictate a fair amount of their season is just how much Demirbay can replace what Brandt brought to the table, and if he could replicate what he did for Hoffenheim last season, then there's the chance that Leverkusen come close to not missing a beat.

Another intriguing get by Leverkusen was snatching up Moussa Diaby from PSG. Diaby is an interesting prospect: he was a notable player at youth levels in France with him winning the Titi d’Or in 2016 for most promising male talent in the PSG academy, but was at risk of being another example of PSG’s inability to utilize their impressive academy. Then last season happened, where Diaby was one of several academy kids to get some game time in Ligue 1. For a 19 year old in his first season in a big 5 league, putting up a scoring contribution (goals + assists) per 90 rate of 0.57 with expected goals + assists numbers that weren’t too far behind was pretty impressive.

Despite the strong work in 1260 league minutes last season, I do have some reservations about Diaby’s ceiling as a prospect. Playing on a super team that has a ridiculous talent advantage over the rest of the league will help in inflating your statistical production. With PSG, Diaby functioned a lot of times as an off-ball runner on the left side who was tasked with keeping the pitch stretched and taking advantage of space behind the backline to run in and create cut-backs in the box. Diaby's off-ball work was excellent for someone his age, and that should be celebrated. His on-ball work has more questions: he's extremely left-footed, his touch and ability to cleanly receive the ball in the inside channels was erratic, and he was prone to not having great awareness and missing out on runners making runs into dangerous areas, merely recycling the ball to a nearby teammate. It's also hard to know how much Diaby will get to do what made him successful last season, which is stretch the opposition and make runs into the wide areas of the penalty box.

2019-20 Outlook

It would be fun to say that this Bayer Leverkusen side comes into 2019-20 as a dark horse given their collective squad talent and how strong they were in 2019, but it's just hard to go there so long as Bayern Munich exists. Even with things not going their way for large portions of the season, they still won the Bundesliga title and were statistically by far the best team in the league. Though the current iteration of Bayern would not compare favorably to some of the previous ones from the 2010s, they still possess the most talented squad in the league and should once again finish at the top so long as a total meltdown doesn't occur. With all that out of the way, there's a lot to be excited for with the upcoming 2019-20 season for Bayer Leverkusen. We get a full season of Peter Bosz at the helm, and see if the club can pick things right up from where they were last season in terms of performance. Their summer signings were smart and should help in a meaningful way. With Bailey and Havertz, there's the potential that this is the year that either or both make the leap into true stardom. If one does it, then qualifying for the Champions League should be well within their reach. If both become stars in the same season, then the idea of Leverkusen running Bayern relatively close as the 2nd best team in Germany becomes more feasible. Set some free time during the season to watching Bayer Leverkusen. For good or for bad, they're always a fascinating side, and 2019-20 could feature a lot more good than bad.

A look at the Atletico Madrid rebuild

On May 14th, Antoine Griezmann announced publicly that he was leaving Atletico Madrid. He’s still lingering on the books as Atletico and Barcelona publicly air out a bizarre, tense negotiation process, but at the time of Griezmann’s announcement, the club faced a serious question: How do we rebuild this team? Griezmann was their best player, one of the few on earth who can turn a game on its head and carry a team. His role during his entire Atletico tenure was to lug an offensive scheme that rarely dared to enter the final third or score more than one goal per game. Griezmann, a key cog who orchestrated so much for France in the World Cup, was reduced to slowing down counters and recycling possession on so many occasions. Atletico lost their main creator, but have also lost so much of their core. Diego Godin has moved to Inter Milan. Filipe Luis and Juanfran are leaving the club. Lucas Hernandez, a breakout young defender and one of the league’s best, has left for Bayern Munich. He was the man that could’ve eased the transition. Rodri Hernandez, the most valuable defensive midfielder in Spain, was sold to Manchester City -- a team that suits his playing style much more. Rodri, like Griezmann, will thrive in an environment where he sees more of the ball. Only Koke, Saul, Tomas Partey, Stefan Savic, Jan Oblak, and Jose Gimenez remain from that Atletico squad that took to the field in the 2016 Champions League final against Real Madrid in Milan. Nearly two months after Griezmann’s announcement, Atletico answered the call by spending just over £176m on four players: Joao Felix, Marcos Llorente, Felipe, and Renan Lodi. Hector Herrera was nabbed from Porto for free, too. They took an unprecedented gamble on Felix -- spending more money on him than any club in history (apart from Paris Saint-Germain) has ever spent on a player. Felix, as promising as he is, has just a one-year sample size at the top level. However, that small sample size is a very impressive one. Felix is not a Griezmann carbon copy, but has tremendous upside as a 19-year-old who thrives behind the main striker, is comfortable creating from deep, composed in tight spaces, and is a quick incisive passer and cool finisher -- all traits Simeone needed Griezmann for. A lot will be asked of the teenager by Simeone, and it will be interesting to see how his physical profile endures an entire season of defensive work. The Portuguese is not an athletic freak -- he often is taken out of the game in the second half due to his low stamina. Defensively, we’ve yet to see him in a low block like Atleti’s. But, in a vacuum, Felix is an interesting replacement for Griezmann, and despite Atleti spending £113m on him, they will be well on course to have a £100m+ net positive for the summer once they sell Griezmann officially. Atleti needed to move the needle somehow during this rebuild, and not many other stars would’ve been at their disposal with Felix’s specific skill-set. This Atleti team has come too far and come too close to fall into irrelevancy again. With Simeone -- the man who defines this era -- still around, they will always try to be competing at an elite level. It won't be easy, particularly with the squad still needing work. Atletico fans can at least be optimistic about one thing: Simeone tends to have his team at an elite defensive level regardless of who plays. Last season, it was a guessing game as to who would be available at the back. Lucas Hernandez missed 26 games due to injury; Jose Gimenez missed 19; Stefan Savic missed 18; Filipe Luis missed 13; Diego Godin missed 10; and Juanfran missed 9. Simeone’s defense was a mish-mash of whoever was humanly able to walk, and rarely did he have his preferred quartet. Still, Atleti had the best defensive record in La Liga, and lowest expected goals against of any team in Spain. When all else fails, Jan Oblak goes into alien mode and masks defensive cracks. This solidity will give the rest of the team a base to work from. How all of the new signings will integrate into the reinvention of Atletico will be fascinating. Marcos Llorente, like his predecessor Rodri, plays his best as a single anchor where he can read passing lanes and start counters. But Simeone never gave Rodri the gift of playing that role, and rarely deviated from his 4-4-2 where he unapologetically arranged a midfield of four central midfielders. He also never gave Rodri, a deft passer, a possession-based scheme that took advantage of his vertical artistry. Still, Rodri’s numbers across the board were impressive, and it will be exciting to see what he can accomplish under Pep, in a blueprint where players zip around without the ball and provide outlets for long-range passes. City will make life easy for him.

Llorente, a player less adept than Rodri with the ball at his feet, is among the best readers of the game at his position in Spain, as he showed in his breakout year at Alaves in 2016/17. He continued this under Santiago Solari this season, albeit in a small sample size, surprising and impressing with his vertical passing, dribbling, and shooting. When you lose Rodri -- the most promising defensive midfielder in Spain and possible heir to Sergio Busquets -- flipping him to another league for £63m and replacing him with someone like Llorente for £27m is about as good as you can do. Llorente, a close friend of several Atletico players, is still only 24, and midfielders often don’t peak until they’re in their late 20s. Atletico have salvaged the situation well. Atletico’s biggest concern has still not been addressed: Goals. If no other striker arrives, they will be hoping Alvaro Morata takes a big leap this season. Morata looked good in Madrid last season during his loan spell -- finally looking at home and in a comfortable environment. That form needs to continue, and even improve. But that’s asking a lot of a striker who’s never been prolific. Morata is now 26, and has scored more than 12 goals in a season just once. Atletico’s goal-scoring woes go beyond taking chances too, they are deep and systemic. This team doesn’t create at a high clip, even with Griezmann around. Their chances were worth just over 39 expected goals last season by StatsBomb's figures, a mark that was only 11th-best in the league, and a galactic 24 expected goals behind Barcelona. Simeone has tried to play more offensively in the past. In the 2016/17 season, following another Champions League final heartache against Real Madrid, he had his team playing higher up the pitch. It worked for a good stretch, but Simeone has struggled finding a balance since then, and his team hasn’t quite looked like their elite selves for a couple seasons now. Atletico haven’t been able to find consistent help for Griezmann. Any of the creators they’ve signed to help him -- Thomas Lemar, Gelson Martins, Vitolo -- have not panned out. Angel Correa has had patches of brilliance but isn’t consistent. Yannick Carrasco was a headache to deal with, but they do miss the danger he created on the flank. Joao Felix would have been an interesting pairing alongside Griezmann to form a tasty transition offense -- but that window is likely gone now. Instead, Felix will have a heavy burden on himself, whether it’s fair or not. Fans will find it difficult to turn away from his price tag. If Felix’s small sample size is misleading, then there’s no way to flip him and make your money back -- that’s a sunk cost. But if Atletico are willing to be patient with him, they should be excited about his ability and upside. In a vacuum, Felix fits a lot of needs, even if we are still likely several years away from his peak. This will be a difficult transition period for Atleti, but one that’s not as bad as it initially seemed. They are still a top-three team in Spain with the current roster, and tons of room for future growth. Circle that home game against Barcelona in December -- the Wanda will be raucous as they welcome back Griezmann.

Japan are struggling, Australia might be fine and other early World Cup statistical nuggets

As far as sample sizes go, two games is minuscule. There is nothing to be found in two games worth of data that a third can’t immediately nullify. The challenge of international soccer is that while two games don’t tell us much, a full third of the 2019 World Cup field will be back on their couches after game number three. So, let’s stretch those numbers to the breaking point and see if they can tell us anything useful.

Here are all 24 teams ranked by their expected goals scored per match.

 

 

One thing this list makes crystal clear is that with only two games played, the most determinative factor is the level of opponent faced. It’s not surprising for example that the United States tops the list, but Sweden at the second spot, that’s explained more by having the good fortune of a group with Chile and Thailand in it, than any distinguishing factor the Swedes might bring to the table.

Similarly, Canada and the Netherlands in third and fifth respectively have had Cameroon and New Zealand to hammer away at. And while each of those less heralded sides have had their moments, those matches have largely consisted of the favorite throwing punches and the underdog flirting with being able to absorb them before ultimately succumbing. The same is true of England, sitting in pretty in fourth place on this list.

Which brings us to Japan. Despite, like England, having a relatively easy opening couple of matches against Scotland and Argentina, they are nowhere to be seen at the top of this list. They’re actually below average. Only nine teams have less xG per match than Japan’s 0.60. Given who they’ve played, that’s a really bad sign.

A major part of the problem is that they can’t generate good shots. They’ve taken 12.50 shots per match. That’s a more respectable ninth in the tournament. But they just can’t create good chances.

 

 

Mana Iwabuchi scored a banger from outside the box but other than one (soft) penalty, only Hina Sugita’s clang off the post in first half stoppage time against Scotland really moved the xG needle.

 

 

If Japan had put in these attacking performances against strong sides, it wouldn’t merit concern. But they didn’t, they put them in against two of the weaker teams in the tournament, the same two teams that England did this to.

 

 

Japan’s four points will see them through to the knockouts, but they certainly seem to be limping there. Tournaments are short and all it takes is a game or two to shift things dramatically, but right now 2015’s finalists are heading into the latter stages looking much more like an easy out for a strong side to put out of their misery rather than a contender looking to make a real run at winning the thing.

Australia, on the other hand might be better than their numbers indicate, and their numbers are quite respectable. Down 2-0 to Brazil after an opening match loss to Italy, they were staring down their World Cup mortality before scoring three to complete a stunning comeback victory. Australia’s numbers this tournament are mediocre. They’re eighth in non-penalty xG which is respectable. On the defensive side of the ball, long thought to be their weakness (and where they’ve conceded five goals) they are also eighth.

But, unlike Japan, Australia haven’t had the benefit of playing the cupcakier end of the field. Italy have been the tournaments biggest surprise, following up their surprise opening match win against Australia with a dominating 5-0 performance against Jamaica, one of the tournaments weaker teams. Italy wasn’t tested in that match, but 5-0 is the kind of summary execution of subpar opponent that meets expectations for a top international team. We don’t yet know how good Italy is, but they might be a legitimate unexpected force.

Then there’s Brazil. Brazil aren’t at their best. Marta is coming off injury. Formiga is 41. Their “young” dynamic stars, Debinha and Andressa are 28 and 27. But, they’re still Brazil. They’ve still been above average both in attack and defense. With their own win over Jamaica under their belt they will likely make it to the knockout rounds. Australia’s win against them doesn’t say as much about them as it might once have, but it’s more impressive than some of the wins that the tournament favorites have put up.

And Argentina still have Jamaica left to play in the group. If they put up the same kind of giant numbers against one of the worst teams in the tournament that Italy and Brazil did, Jamaica’s negative eight goal difference is the second worst in the tournament, then their numbers will put them near the top of the pack, despite their shaky start.

The reason these comparisons are useful is that by comparing teams within groups it’s possible to grasp towards some understanding of how the numbers might be misreading their accomplishments. This stands in opposition to groups that have clear divides between the two haves and the two have nots. Group E and Group F have very little for analysts to sink their teeth into. Canada and the Netherlands are obviously better than Cameroon and New Zealand and the United States and Sweden are obviously better than Chile and Thailand.

The order of events has served to further obscure meaningful differences. The top teams have each gotten to beat up on both minnows first. That means that all four teams have already clearly punched their ticket to the knockouts. Their third group stage match, where, for the first time in the tournament, they square off against capable competition is now as much about managing minutes, squad rotation and preparation as it is about getting three points. Happenstance means that we won’t learn much about these four sides until the knockouts start and the margin for error decreases dramatically.

Finding interesting nuggets in the statistics early in a tournament is more of an art than a science. Sometimes the numbers point to something obvious, like Japan not being very good this time around. Sometimes, they point to something contingent, suggesting that given a certain set of assumptions, Italy are good, and Brazil are fine, then the conclusion that Australia is good is justified. And sometimes, like with Canada, the Netherlands, the United States and Sweden, all you an do is shrug and wait for more information.

 

Header image courtesy of the Press Association

Spain's World Cup showing belies a true revolution

When Spain crashed out of the 2015 Women’s World Cup at group stage and after failing to win a game, it accelerated a revolution that was simmering within women’s football in the country. Before being split onto two flights for the return from Canada, the team presented an open letter to the Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF), calling for change and for the end of Ignacio Quereda’s 28 year tenure as the coach. Stories of Quereda’s dismissive and sexist behaviour, his archaic training methods and the lack of any opposition scouting were leaked to trusted journalists who had been stalwart followers of women’s football. By the time the planes landed in Madrid, the media was rife with stories and scandal. The players presented a united group in front of the cameras. As had happened to players before them, they knew that speaking out could cost them their positions in the team, but enough was enough. The media and public outrage was too great for the RFEF to contain. It was well known that then President Ángel María Villar had little interest in women’s football, but even he couldn’t sweep this mess under the carpet and pretend that nothing had happened. Quereda resigned before he was dismissed, and Jorge Vilda was appointed as the new coach. Vilda is a purebred. His father Ángel worked as a fitness trainer for some of the best coaches in La Liga (such as Luis Aragonés, Johan Cruyff, Jupp Heynckes and José Mourinho) and his son was always around the teams and managers as he grew up. Vilda Snr. was then employed by the RFEF as coach of the Spanish women’s U19 team. Jorge also came onboard to coach the U17 women. The Vildas – Ángel in particular – were respected and loved by the players that they coached, and the results began to reflect their hard work and input into the Spanish women’s game, as medals were won at youth level UEFA European Championships and FIFA World Cups. Shockingly, Vilda Snr.’s contract was not renewed by the RFEF in 2015. The official statement was that the Federation was looking to “inject younger blood at coaching level”. Ironically, Ángel was 65 at the time and Quereda was 62, but somehow the latter remained in his position – for a few months, at least, until the senior women’s team called for change. The changes came. Vilda Jr. took over and 10 senior players on the team were either immediately dropped or marginalised into secondary roles for the next year, before not being selected again. The official stance for their non-selections was that they were for “technical reasons”, but given that some of these players were (and still are) performing at high levels, that seemed to be a far-fetched excuse. Since taking over, Vilda has retained a core squad and tinkered with the lineups by calling in new players on an irregular basis, and only when incumbent players were unavailable. The new players have barely enough time to settle in before being ousted again. However, several youth team players have made the jump to senior level in Vilda’s time – Mariona Caldentey, Patri Guijarro, Aitana Bonmatí, Lucía García, Andrea Falcón and Nahikari García – all of whom are in the current World Cup squad playing in France. Lucía García and Nahikari García are Spain's top two expected goals leaders Spain's expected goals tree map after two games When Vilda announced his 2019 squad for Spain’s second appearance at a Women’s World Cup, there were howls of disbelief as 2 of the season’s top Liga performers, Ángela Sosa and Esther González, were omitted. Both these players are capable of shooting from outside the box and taking every opportunity that is presented to them to have a shot at goal. This is certainly something that is missing from this Spanish selection, but that’s nothing new if you’ve watched any Spanish football for at least the past 10 years. The Spain game is based on possession, meaning “if we have the ball, then you don’t”. However, possession is meaningless without intent, and the Spanish women’s team is not alone in playing incredible passing football that can make a viewer gasp out loud at its beauty, but also groan in frustration that there is no one willing to take a shot on goal. It’s almost as if Spanish players think that they can’t take a shot unless they are in the box with at least a 90% success rate of getting the ball into the net. Unsurprisingly, Spain have attempted the third-most passes in the final third of the tournament, after the United States and the Netherlands. The games against South Africa and Germany have seen Spain retain possession and the team looks particularly strong in midfield with Virginia Torrecilla the standout player and Aitana Bonmatí playing a strong cameo role. The defence is doing reasonably well too – centre-back Mapi León is the standout player there. The danger attacking players – Jenni Hermoso, Lucía García and Nahikari García – are producing some fine opportunities with little reward to show for it, thus far. The attacking statistics are woeful. Of the three goals scored, only one has been from open play with the other two from the penalty spot. Shots are being taken but mostly off target or straight at the Keepers, so Spain still has a lot of work to do up front in the areas of accuracy and opportunity. Spain have had 32 shots from open play in their opening two games, but only nine have been on target (a fairly poor 28%). Spain's open-play shot map, with only 28 per cent of shots on target To Vilda’s credit, he reacted early in the game against South Africa, making changes at the beginning of the second half which saw the team more fluid and dynamic. After the match, Jenni Hermoso commented that “she liked Nahikari García on the pitch” for the danger and opportunities that she creates – perhaps a subtle pot shot at Vilda’s lineup choices. Vilda adjusted the lineup again for the Germany game and it almost worked except for a massive defensive error which allowed Germany a squeaky 1-0 win, but again the Spanish attack was not accurate enough in front of goal, and Vicky Losada would have been a better choice in midfield instead of Silvia Meseguer. The final group game will be against China, and Spain will be keen to win the game to finish second in Group B, or at least be one of the 4 best third-placed teams in order to qualify for the knockout rounds. The milestones are coming for the team, and this tournament has already seen them win their first-ever World Cup game (against South Africa). Getting out of the group stage will be the next aim, where they will play either the USA (if they finish second in Group B), or England (if they qualify in third). Unless Spain gets their shooting boots on, it will be difficult to see them progressing beyond the round of 16 where they will be confronted with two strong opponents. Spanish women’s football is on an upwards trajectory, particularly in the age group categories in which both the U17 and U19 teams won their Euro competitions last year, the U17s won the World Cup in Uruguay and the U20s were runners-up at the World Cup in France. We haven’t yet seen the best of what Spain has to offer in attack. There are younger forwards coming through that have a more direct style – players such as Eva Navarro, Clàudia Pina and Salma Paralluelo. When combined with incumbent players such as Guijarro, Bonmatí, Lucía García and Nahikari García, we will see a more dynamic Spanish attack to complement the possession game. The bigger question will be if it will be Jorge Vilda that will manage the next transition for the Spanish La Absoluta. There are already rumblings of dissatisfaction that he is not selecting the best of the available players, instead playing favourites, and not properly utilising the players that he is choosing. There is also a question about how he can be the Spanish Women’s Technical Director as well as the coach of the Spanish senior team – something which in their Technical Director’s Report, FIFA strongly advises against, because that is too much influence from one person in power. Should Vilda step down, there is a huge desire within the Spanish WoFo community that the next coach be a woman, and there are at least five or six very strong candidates that could take his place, beginning with U17 coach Toña Is. However, that’s in the future. In the meantime, the fans are celebrating each success, mindful of how far the Spanish women have come since the brave generation of players stood strong in 2015 and demanded change – ten of them to the detriment of their own careers. Spanish women’s football will be forever indebted to them.